| Revision as of 22:28, 4 May 2007 editSmee (talk | contribs)28,728 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:24, 4 May 2007 edit undoDGG (talk | contribs)316,874 edits →[]: wkNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| *'''Delete''' Something literally ]. ] <small>( ] • ] • ] )</small> 21:53, 3 May 2007 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Something literally ]. ] <small>( ] • ] • ] )</small> 21:53, 3 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' - User appears to have established beginning basis for verifiability in external links, instead of using cite formatting in a potential References section. ] 22:28, 4 May 2007 (UTC). | *'''Keep''' - User appears to have established beginning basis for verifiability in external links, instead of using cite formatting in a potential References section. ] 22:28, 4 May 2007 (UTC). | ||
| *'''weak keep''' The first of those at least using the term in the title. ''']''' 23:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:24, 4 May 2007
Favorite betrayal criterion
- Favorite betrayal criterion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Delete. Original research. Vanity. See here. All links refer directly or indirectly to Mike Ossipoff. This criterion isn't discussed in serious, academic circles. This criterion is not notable. Not a single paper about this criterion has ever been accepted for publication. Furthermore, this article is a repost of a previously-deleted article. Yellowbeard 20:44, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Something literally made up in school one day. ObiterDicta ( pleadings • errata • appeals ) 21:53, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - User appears to have established beginning basis for verifiability in external links, instead of using cite formatting in a potential References section. Smee 22:28, 4 May 2007 (UTC).
- weak keep The first of those at least using the term in the title. DGG 23:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC)