Misplaced Pages

Delta wing: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:46, 27 July 2003 editMaury Markowitz (talk | contribs)Administrators75,982 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 09:09, 14 August 2003 edit undoJacco (talk | contribs)10 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 7: Line 7:
Deltas fell out of favour due to some undesirable characteristics, notably flow-separation at high angles of attack (]s have similar problems), and high drag at low altitudes. This limited them primarily to the high-speed, high-altitude ] roles. A modification, the '''compound delta''', added another much more highly swept delta wing in front of the main one, to create the vortex in a more controlled fashion and thereby reduce the low-speed drag. Deltas fell out of favour due to some undesirable characteristics, notably flow-separation at high angles of attack (]s have similar problems), and high drag at low altitudes. This limited them primarily to the high-speed, high-altitude ] roles. A modification, the '''compound delta''', added another much more highly swept delta wing in front of the main one, to create the vortex in a more controlled fashion and thereby reduce the low-speed drag.


As the performance of jet engines grew, fighers with more traditional planforms found they could perform almost as well as the deltas, but do so while manuvering much harder and at a wider range of altitudes. Today a reminant of the compund delta can be found on most ], in the form of ]s. These are effectively very small delta wings placed so they remain out of the airflow in cruising flight, but start to generate a vortex at high angles of attack. The vortex is then captured on the top of the wing to provide additional lift, thereby combining the delta's high-alpha "trick" with a conventional highly effecient wing planform. As the performance of jet engines grew, fighers with more traditional planforms found they could perform almost as well as the deltas, but do so while manuvering much harder and at a wider range of altitudes. Today a remnant of the compund delta can be found on most ], in the form of ]s. These are effectively very small delta wings placed so they remain out of the airflow in cruising flight, but start to generate a vortex at high angles of attack. The vortex is then captured on the top of the wing to provide additional lift, thereby combining the delta's high-alpha "trick" with a conventional highly effecient wing planform.

Revision as of 09:09, 14 August 2003

The delta-wing is a wing planform in the form of a large triangle. Its use was first pioneered by Alexander Lippich prior to WWII in Germany, but none of his designs entered service. After the war the delta became the favoured design for high-speed use, and was used almost to exclusion of other planforms by Convair in the United States and Dassault in France. In early use delta-winged aircraft were often found with no other horizontal control surfaces, creating a tail-less design, but most modern versions use a canard in front of the wing to modify the airflow over it, most notably during lower altitude flight.

The primary advantage of the design is that the wing's leading edge remains behind the shock wave generated by the nose of the aircraft when flying at supersonic speeds, which was a distinct improvement on traditional wing designs. Another advantage is that as the angle of attack increases the leading edge of the wing generates a huge vortex which remains attached to the upper surface of the wing, making the delta have very high stall points. The combination of these two features is a dream come true, a normal wing built for high speed use is typically dangerous at low speeds, but in this regime the delta transitions to a mode of lift based on the vortex it generates.

Lippich studied a number of ramjet powered (sometimes coal-fueled!) delta-wing interceptor aircraft during the war, one progressing as far as a glider prototype. After the war Lippich migrated to the US, where he ended up working at Convair. Here the other engineers became very interested in his interceptor designs, and started work on a larger version known as the F-92. This project was eventually cancelled as impractical, but a prototype flying testbed was almost complete by that point, and was later flown widely as the XF-92. The design generated intense interest around the world. Soon almost every aircraft design, notably interceptors, were designed around a delta-wing. Examples include the Convair B-58 Hustler, the Avro Arrow and the MiG-21.

Deltas fell out of favour due to some undesirable characteristics, notably flow-separation at high angles of attack (swept-wings have similar problems), and high drag at low altitudes. This limited them primarily to the high-speed, high-altitude interceptor roles. A modification, the compound delta, added another much more highly swept delta wing in front of the main one, to create the vortex in a more controlled fashion and thereby reduce the low-speed drag.

As the performance of jet engines grew, fighers with more traditional planforms found they could perform almost as well as the deltas, but do so while manuvering much harder and at a wider range of altitudes. Today a remnant of the compund delta can be found on most fighter aircraft, in the form of leading edge extensions. These are effectively very small delta wings placed so they remain out of the airflow in cruising flight, but start to generate a vortex at high angles of attack. The vortex is then captured on the top of the wing to provide additional lift, thereby combining the delta's high-alpha "trick" with a conventional highly effecient wing planform.