| Revision as of 23:56, 8 May 2007 editVanished user skj3ioo3jwifjsek35y (talk | contribs)1,567 edits →You have been blocked← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:43, 9 May 2007 edit undoJpgordon (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Administrators82,308 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| Moreover you used the blocked as weapons in order to totally erase the criticisms.If you were honset you would have write your own version.but you did not. | Moreover you used the blocked as weapons in order to totally erase the criticisms.If you were honset you would have write your own version.but you did not. | ||
| Instead you have used in blocking as a weapons. | Instead you have used in blocking as a weapons. | ||
| *Hi. I've blocked the accounts you created to evade the 3RR block you were serving. Please do not do that again. Thank you. --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 23:43, 9 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:43, 9 May 2007
Welcome!
Hello, Vanished user skj3ioo3jwifjsek35y, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! WilyD 16:14, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Steven Weinstock
The article Steven Weinstock has been speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Misplaced Pages. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Alabamaboy 11:03, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Please
Please see my note at Talk:Jew Watch#Polemics. Thanks. ←Humus sapiens 21:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
3RR
You're likely to be blocked soon for violating our 3RR policy, which says that editors may not revert more than three times in 24 hours. Please review it carefully at WP:3RR. Many thanks, SlimVirgin 22:48, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
You have been blocked
Heimstern Läufer 23:03, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
This block is totally unjustified.I have been added a section and important one that show the criticisms of Jew watch and that have been erased. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oren.tal (talk • contribs)
- If you are really serious about participating in the project, may I suggest you spend some time learning about WP policies and improving your English (maybe get a spellchecker). ←Humus sapiens 23:24, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- You were warned about the three-revert rule, and then you just went ahead and reverted anyway. If you'd stopped after being warned, I'd have been hesitant to block you; since you continued, I had no hesitation about it. Heimstern Läufer 23:26, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
The blocked have used has a weapons to force opinion of you on other. I will complain about your policy.You should not use in the block as a weapons to force opinion but only against vandalism.I have not erased any part of this article but just add an important information that you have erased.Shame on you.You should not be administrator at all.
- Read WP:3RR until you understand it. Any of us would have been blocked for the same behaviour. --jpgordon 23:43, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
I mention true fact that the website quote the protocol and it was proved faked by the London time. Moreover you used the blocked as weapons in order to totally erase the criticisms.If you were honset you would have write your own version.but you did not. Instead you have used in blocking as a weapons.
- Hi. I've blocked the accounts you created to evade the 3RR block you were serving. Please do not do that again. Thank you. --jpgordon 23:43, 9 May 2007 (UTC)