| Revision as of 22:47, 29 April 2005 editජපස (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers60,451 editsm →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:01, 29 April 2005 edit undoUngtss (talk | contribs)6,685 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| This article is basically a personal research essay by ] about a term invented by creationist author ] in his book '']''. Johnson coined the term as a means to justify ] from a ] ] perspective. While there are other creationists who are on the ID bandwagon and bandy about Johnson's invented term (notably those from Leader U, a creationist "web-based" university), you will find that the term has no counterpart on ] (0 hits) and Google contains a mere 347 hits which are mostly propaganda. The essay as it appears right now is obviously a creationist soapbox meant to encourage the invention of a constituency for a concept that only one person has ever stated exists. Parts of the essay about Johnson's beliefs can be salvaged and incorporated into the ] article or the ] article as need be, but this article as a seperate subject is absolutely unwarranted and serves only to bring a POV-fork to other articles on creationism. ] 22:43, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) | This article is basically a personal research essay by ] about a term invented by creationist author ] in his book '']''. Johnson coined the term as a means to justify ] from a ] ] perspective. While there are other creationists who are on the ID bandwagon and bandy about Johnson's invented term (notably those from Leader U, a creationist "web-based" university), you will find that the term has no counterpart on ] (0 hits) and Google contains a mere 347 hits which are mostly propaganda. The essay as it appears right now is obviously a creationist soapbox meant to encourage the invention of a constituency for a concept that only one person has ever stated exists. Parts of the essay about Johnson's beliefs can be salvaged and incorporated into the ] article or the ] article as need be, but this article as a seperate subject is absolutely unwarranted and serves only to bring a POV-fork to other articles on creationism. ] 22:43, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ----- | |||
| . . . . . . ] 23:01, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:01, 29 April 2005
Theistic realism
This article is basically a personal research essay by User:Ungtss about a term invented by creationist author Philip Johnson in his book Reason in the Balance. Johnson coined the term as a means to justify Intelligent Design from a Christian philosophy perspective. While there are other creationists who are on the ID bandwagon and bandy about Johnson's invented term (notably those from Leader U, a creationist "web-based" university), you will find that the term has no counterpart on ] (0 hits) and Google contains a mere 347 hits which are mostly propaganda. The essay as it appears right now is obviously a creationist soapbox meant to encourage the invention of a constituency for a concept that only one person has ever stated exists. Parts of the essay about Johnson's beliefs can be salvaged and incorporated into the Philip Johnson article or the Intelligent Design article as need be, but this article as a seperate subject is absolutely unwarranted and serves only to bring a POV-fork to other articles on creationism. Joshuaschroeder 22:43, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
formal debate at stanford on the topic. published argument against it. education book from loyola describing thomas aquinas as a founder of theistic realism. another book describing it as a "voice in education." another article. this article, which was selected and copied word for word for the dictionary of religion. mention in stanford dictionary of philosophy. Ungtss 23:01, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)