| Revision as of 03:18, 11 May 2007 editBobo192 (talk | contribs)Administrators116,300 editsm Typo← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:07, 2 July 2007 edit undo64.202.147.90 (talk) ←Created page with 'This is really dense. To remove a website from your database just because it insults one of the admins is the worst case of abuse of power I've seen on this site, e...'Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| This is really dense. To remove a website from your database just because it insults one of the admins is the worst case of abuse of power I've seen on this site, ever. And considering what jerkfaces some of the admins(read:MONGO) are, I've seen a lot. You can still see a good claim to ED's right to an article in the deletion log : 'Lulz. ED has been mentioned in both The Washington Post and The Guardian. I think it's time to recreate it. Kfan2 19:52, 13 April 2007 ...' Of course, I'm sure some admin can completely erase that as soon as they see this. Whatever. It's not like this site is supposed to be written in a neutral point of view or anything. -] 07:07, 2 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {{notice|The article on '''Encyclopedia Dramatica''' has been deleted by consensus due to the absence of reliable sources. It will not be re-created unless it can be shown that the site is the primary focus of non-trivial coverage in multiple, reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. Due to repeated misconduct, this talk page is protected from editing. If you have evidence of substantial coverage of the type that is required before we can have an article, please take it to ]. Note that links to Encyclopedia Dramatica are automatically barred due to the site hosting gross personal attacks and privacy violations (see ]).}} | |||
Revision as of 07:07, 2 July 2007
This is really dense. To remove a website from your database just because it insults one of the admins is the worst case of abuse of power I've seen on this site, ever. And considering what jerkfaces some of the admins(read:MONGO) are, I've seen a lot. You can still see a good claim to ED's right to an article in the deletion log : 'Lulz. ED has been mentioned in both The Washington Post and The Guardian. I think it's time to recreate it. Kfan2 19:52, 13 April 2007 ...' Of course, I'm sure some admin can completely erase that as soon as they see this. Whatever. It's not like this site is supposed to be written in a neutral point of view or anything. -64.202.147.90 07:07, 2 July 2007 (UTC)