Revision as of 01:59, 17 May 2007 editShotwell (talk | contribs)3,697 edits a note | Revision as of 10:18, 17 May 2007 edit undoWill Beback (talk | contribs)112,162 edits RfCUNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Relatively recent examples have been provided, but it is important to note that the behavior described in this RfC has been sustained since DPeterson first began editing. ] 01:59, 17 May 2007 (UTC) | Relatively recent examples have been provided, but it is important to note that the behavior described in this RfC has been sustained since DPeterson first began editing. ] 01:59, 17 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
:The charges of sock-puppetry apparently weren't pursued, but are being repeated. Is there a reason there hasn't been an RfCU to settle the matter? ]] ] 10:18, 17 May 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:18, 17 May 2007
Relatively recent examples have been provided, but it is important to note that the behavior described in this RfC has been sustained since DPeterson first began editing. shotwell 01:59, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- The charges of sock-puppetry apparently weren't pursued, but are being repeated. Is there a reason there hasn't been an RfCU to settle the matter? ·:·Will Beback ·:· 10:18, 17 May 2007 (UTC)