| Revision as of 19:10, 22 May 2007 editGordonWatts (talk | contribs)4,767 edits →What are you doing?: proper place to opine not here, but thank you for your opinion← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:11, 22 May 2007 edit undoGordonWatts (talk | contribs)4,767 editsm →What are you doing?Next edit → | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| I have a right to discuss my concerns too. My opponants have had their "day in court," and should not seek "double jeapardy." If my complaints are stupid, they will fall on their own. | I have a right to discuss my concerns too. My opponants have had their "day in court," and should not seek "double jeapardy." If my complaints are stupid, they will fall on their own. | ||
| Any attempts to avoid addressing the matter smack of a dictatorship, where only "who has power" matters, not "who is right" --or not "what does the law / rules" states. My answer. No need to discuss this matter here. Any further discussion here on my page will be speedy deleted, and I will ask the poster to "take it to the appropriate page |
Any attempts to avoid addressing the matter smack of a dictatorship, where only "who has power" matters, not "who is right" --or not "what does the law / rules" states. My answer. No need to discuss this matter here. '''Any further discussion of this matter here on my page will be speedy deleted, and I will ask the poster to "take it to the appropriate page," namely the page in which the original poster mentions.''' Have a nice day, Friday. If you wish to opine, that is the proper forum, not here.--] 19:10, 22 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:11, 22 May 2007
User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive01
User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive02
User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive03
User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive04
User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive05
User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive06
User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive07
Links to your websites on your user page
Gordon, you are not "all users". You have exhausted the community's patience.
The next time you link to any of your web sites, on any page, for any reason in Misplaced Pages, I will block you for 6 months. Nandesuka 11:47, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Why do you make such a response? The community action against me did not reach a concensus regarding this issue. It did not even reach 50%. I am justified in seeking community sanctions against you -and the admin who illegally made the proclamations in that community action, but, because I am easy-going, and, in the spirit of "assuming good faith," I will assume that you acted in good faith and did not know this. I will go one step further: Since I am a Christian, I will not demand what is rightfully mine, that is, the right to post links to my home pages on my user page. However, I do retain that right.
Since I asked a question in the paragraph above, you are welcome to answer, if you desire, and, I would be pleased. I await your response.
Also, please note that I granted your request regarding not listing my links, even though that is my right, and even though no community action has reached concensus, or even 50% in this regards. (The last, and only, community action against me featured many participants, and in the many issues, each one resulted in less than 50% support of the complaint against me, and more than 50% support of me.) I am not causing anyone any trouble. I am cleaning up my pages and not causing any arguments. Why do you come to my page and cause trouble? Thanks you for your feedbacks.--GordonWatts 16:55, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
What are you doing?
This is fairly ridiculous. What are you hoping to accomplish here? Does this improve the encyclopedia in some way? Friday (talk) 19:06, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Others have a right to accuse me of things -even when no cause exists, and even if no concensus can be obtained.
I have a right to discuss my concerns too. My opponants have had their "day in court," and should not seek "double jeapardy." If my complaints are stupid, they will fall on their own.
Any attempts to avoid addressing the matter smack of a dictatorship, where only "who has power" matters, not "who is right" --or not "what does the law / rules" states. My answer. No need to discuss this matter here. Any further discussion of this matter here on my page will be speedy deleted, and I will ask the poster to "take it to the appropriate page," namely the page in which the original poster mentions. Have a nice day, Friday. If you wish to opine, that is the proper forum, not here.--GordonWatts 19:10, 22 May 2007 (UTC)