| Revision as of 00:28, 23 May 2007 editZurishaddai (talk | contribs)2,641 edits removing temp category← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:33, 23 May 2007 edit undoGordonWatts (talk | contribs)4,767 edits + replies to Bish, MichaelNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| | '''This user has been ] from editing Misplaced Pages.'''<br /><small>(see: • ] • • )</small> | | '''This user has been ] from editing Misplaced Pages.'''<br /><small>(see: • ] • • )</small> | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| == + replies to Bish, Michael == | |||
| (cur) (last) 00:00, 23 May 2007 Bishonen (Talk | contribs) m (Protected User talk:GordonWatts: Protecting seems overkill. I recommend everybody who hates to read Gordon's arguments to avert their eyes. | |||
| :Thank you for the suggestion, Bish. That is what I had asked others to do in the first place.--] 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Gordon, I recommend you to post with restraint, or it will be protected again. | |||
| :I try *always* to post with restraint (e.g., polite, assume good faith, no curse words, foul language, etc.) even if others don't do so.--] 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirm) | |||
| :Huh? What? "Autoconfirmed?" - What do you mean? And, by corollary, what do you all mean when you write: " (anon. only, account creation blocked, autoblock disabled)?"--] 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| (cur) (last) 00:02, 23 May 2007 Bishonen (Talk | contribs) (280 bytes) (rm protection template. Semi-protecting. Full protection seems overkill. | |||
| : I agree. It seems now days overkill happens a lot too much.--] 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I recommend everybody who hates to read Gordon's arguments to avert their eyes. Gordon, I recommend you to post with restraint.) | |||
| :I agree it was worth repeating.--] 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| (cur) (last) 00:28, 23 May 2007 MichaelLinnear (Talk | contribs) (896 bytes) (removing temp category) | |||
| :Huh? I looked at your edit, and the info box seems to look the same as before. What were you trying to say, Michael?--] 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :One more thing: Even if I feel that I have a moral right to express my opinion just like others on their user pages, it seems that your suggestion ("Gordon, I recommend you to post with restraint") is appropriate (I agree, Bish), since the "rules" governing expression on one's user pages are not uniformly enforced -that is, enforced the same as with others, so I think I shall restrain myself from expressing opinions of any sort on this page. Can't we change that? Lack of uniformity in enforcement is unfair and wrong: The rules are "for all" --- or "not at all" -anything else is just not fair or just.--] 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:33, 23 May 2007
User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive01
User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive02
User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive03
User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive04
User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive05
User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive06
User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive07
|
This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Misplaced Pages. (see: block log • contributions • page moves • current autoblocks) |
+ replies to Bish, Michael
(cur) (last) 00:00, 23 May 2007 Bishonen (Talk | contribs) m (Protected User talk:GordonWatts: Protecting seems overkill. I recommend everybody who hates to read Gordon's arguments to avert their eyes.
- Thank you for the suggestion, Bish. That is what I had asked others to do in the first place.--GordonWatts 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Gordon, I recommend you to post with restraint, or it will be protected again.
- I try *always* to post with restraint (e.g., polite, assume good faith, no curse words, foul language, etc.) even if others don't do so.--GordonWatts 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirm)
- Huh? What? "Autoconfirmed?" - What do you mean? And, by corollary, what do you all mean when you write: " (anon. only, account creation blocked, autoblock disabled)?"--GordonWatts 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
(cur) (last) 00:02, 23 May 2007 Bishonen (Talk | contribs) (280 bytes) (rm protection template. Semi-protecting. Full protection seems overkill.
- I agree. It seems now days overkill happens a lot too much.--GordonWatts 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
I recommend everybody who hates to read Gordon's arguments to avert their eyes. Gordon, I recommend you to post with restraint.)
- I agree it was worth repeating.--GordonWatts 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
(cur) (last) 00:28, 23 May 2007 MichaelLinnear (Talk | contribs) (896 bytes) (removing temp category)
- Huh? I looked at your edit, and the info box seems to look the same as before. What were you trying to say, Michael?--GordonWatts 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- One more thing: Even if I feel that I have a moral right to express my opinion just like others on their user pages, it seems that your suggestion ("Gordon, I recommend you to post with restraint") is appropriate (I agree, Bish), since the "rules" governing expression on one's user pages are not uniformly enforced -that is, enforced the same as with others, so I think I shall restrain myself from expressing opinions of any sort on this page. Can't we change that? Lack of uniformity in enforcement is unfair and wrong: The rules are "for all" --- or "not at all" -anything else is just not fair or just.--GordonWatts 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)