Misplaced Pages

User talk:GordonWatts: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:33, 23 May 2007 editGordonWatts (talk | contribs)4,767 edits + replies to Bish, Michael← Previous edit Revision as of 19:54, 24 May 2007 edit undoGordonWatts (talk | contribs)4,767 editsm + replies to Bish, Michael: grammarNext edit →
Line 21: Line 21:


(cur) (last) 00:00, 23 May 2007 Bishonen (Talk | contribs) m (Protected User talk:GordonWatts: Protecting seems overkill. I recommend everybody who hates to read Gordon's arguments to avert their eyes. (cur) (last) 00:00, 23 May 2007 Bishonen (Talk | contribs) m (Protected User talk:GordonWatts: Protecting seems overkill. I recommend everybody who hates to read Gordon's arguments to avert their eyes.
:Thank you for the suggestion, Bish. That is what I had asked others to do in the first place.--] 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC) :Thank you for the suggestion, Bish. That is what I had asked others to do in the first place -to actually read the other person's argument.--] 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Gordon, I recommend you to post with restraint, or it will be protected again. Gordon, I recommend you to post with restraint, or it will be protected again.
:I try *always* to post with restraint (e.g., polite, assume good faith, no curse words, foul language, etc.) even if others don't do so.--] 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC) :I try *always* to post with restraint (e.g., polite, assume good faith, no curse words, foul language, etc.) even if others don't do so.--] 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:54, 24 May 2007

User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive01

User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive02

User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive03

User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive04

User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive05

User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive06

User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive07

This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Misplaced Pages.
(see: block logcontributionspage movescurrent autoblocks)

+ replies to Bish, Michael

(cur) (last) 00:00, 23 May 2007 Bishonen (Talk | contribs) m (Protected User talk:GordonWatts: Protecting seems overkill. I recommend everybody who hates to read Gordon's arguments to avert their eyes.

Thank you for the suggestion, Bish. That is what I had asked others to do in the first place -to actually read the other person's argument.--GordonWatts 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Gordon, I recommend you to post with restraint, or it will be protected again.

I try *always* to post with restraint (e.g., polite, assume good faith, no curse words, foul language, etc.) even if others don't do so.--GordonWatts 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirm)

Huh? What? "Autoconfirmed?" - What do you mean? And, by corollary, what do you all mean when you write: " (anon. only, account creation blocked, autoblock disabled)?"--GordonWatts 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

(cur) (last) 00:02, 23 May 2007 Bishonen (Talk | contribs) (280 bytes) (rm protection template. Semi-protecting. Full protection seems overkill.

I agree. It seems now days overkill happens a lot too much.--GordonWatts 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

I recommend everybody who hates to read Gordon's arguments to avert their eyes. Gordon, I recommend you to post with restraint.)

I agree it was worth repeating.--GordonWatts 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

(cur) (last) 00:28, 23 May 2007 MichaelLinnear (Talk | contribs) (896 bytes) (removing temp category)

Huh? I looked at your edit, and the info box seems to look the same as before. What were you trying to say, Michael?--GordonWatts 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
One more thing: Even if I feel that I have a moral right to express my opinion just like others on their user pages, it seems that your suggestion ("Gordon, I recommend you to post with restraint") is appropriate (I agree, Bish), since the "rules" governing expression on one's user pages are not uniformly enforced -that is, enforced the same as with others, so I think I shall restrain myself from expressing opinions of any sort on this page. Can't we change that? Lack of uniformity in enforcement is unfair and wrong: The rules are "for all" --- or "not at all" -anything else is just not fair or just.--GordonWatts 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)