| Revision as of 17:40, 13 March 2005 editInter (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators6,930 editsm rv← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:50, 7 May 2005 edit undo24.9.11.165 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| The '''biomedical model''' of ], has been around for ] as the predominant model used by physicians in the diagnosis of disease. The term is used by practitioners of ], a form of ], in contrast to the ], which incorporates psychological and social factors. | The '''biomedical model''' of ], has been around for ] as the predominant model used by physicians in the diagnosis of disease. The term is used by practitioners of ], a form of ], in contrast to the ], which incorporates psychological and social factors. | ||
| This model |
This model focuses on the physical processes, such as the ], the ] and the ] of a disease. It does not take into account the role of a person's mind or society in the cause and treatment. | ||
| This model is effective at diagnosing and treating most diseases. It cannot be denied that it has been extremely useful throughout history by establishing the reasons that a disease occurs, and in coming up with very effective treatment regimes. | This model is effective at diagnosing and treating most diseases. It cannot be denied that it has been extremely useful throughout history by establishing the reasons that a disease occurs, and in coming up with very effective treatment regimes. | ||
Revision as of 21:50, 7 May 2005
The biomedical model of medicine, has been around for centuries as the predominant model used by physicians in the diagnosis of disease. The term is used by practitioners of Natural Health, a form of alternative medicine, in contrast to the biopsychosocial model, which incorporates psychological and social factors.
This model focuses on the physical processes, such as the pathology, the biochemistry and the physiology of a disease. It does not take into account the role of a person's mind or society in the cause and treatment.
This model is effective at diagnosing and treating most diseases. It cannot be denied that it has been extremely useful throughout history by establishing the reasons that a disease occurs, and in coming up with very effective treatment regimes.
It is however very limiting. By not taking into account society in general, the prevention of disease is omitted. Many diseases affecting first world countries nowadays, such as heart disease and diabetes mellitus are very much dependent on a person's actions and beliefs.