| Revision as of 04:21, 28 May 2007 editBishonen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators80,245 edits You have been blocked← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:23, 28 May 2007 edit undoAnythingyouwant (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors91,255 edits deleting commentsNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| As to its use in pro-life sections; I guess it should be mentioned, but that's something I'd like some consensus on. Would you like me to mention it on the Abortion talk page? - ]] <sup>]</sup> 01:15, 28 May 2007 (UTC) | As to its use in pro-life sections; I guess it should be mentioned, but that's something I'd like some consensus on. Would you like me to mention it on the Abortion talk page? - ]] <sup>]</sup> 01:15, 28 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ==Userspace harassment== | |||
| Just to make sure you don't miss what I just wrote on KillerChihuahua's talkpage, I'll repeat it here: you | |||
| 're done posting on that page. Please don't post there again or you'll face a block for userspace ]. Thank you. ] | ] 02:21, 28 May 2007 (UTC). | |||
| :My response is . There was no harassment by me. The harassment was entirely by KillerChihuahua. People can In any event, I have no need or desire to say anything further to her at this time. Since I have not been blocked, there is no need to dispute any charge of harassment.] 03:58, 28 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==You have been blocked== | |||
| You have to be kidding me. You have been blocked. Oh, and I've reverted your change of my post above. You're free to remove other people's posts from this page, but certainly not to alter them. ] | ] 04:21, 28 May 2007 (UTC). | |||
Revision as of 04:23, 28 May 2007
Archives
Archive 1: Beginning of Time to 14 March 2007.
Archive 2: 14 March 2007 to 14 May 2007.
Vandalism warnings
When you revert vandalism, you might consider warning the editor with the warning templates; should the vandalism continue, editors are usually not blocked unless they have been warned. KillerChihuahua 12:39, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll do that.Ferrylodge 04:03, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
I would like to thank you Ferrylodge, for your support on the miscarriage discussion. Its great to see that there are people like yourself in wiki. --McNoddy 15:16, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
"Mother" and abortion
Somehow I've managed to miss this aspect up until now. I'm not feeling particularly thoughtful tonight, but my immediate opinion would be that mother, while accurate, is a more ambiguous word and so is less precise. Looking at the Answers.com definition brings far more to the table than I had initially thought. "Mother" also may presume that a woman has the intention to be a "child raiser," something she might take issue with. Then you have terms such as "expectant mother"... while I do not know the etymology of such terms, and/or if they are/were politically motivated; it is clear motherhood does not start at the same point for everyone. In the end this curls back to debating the personhood of the fetus, and I don't see that being constructive.
As to its use in pro-life sections; I guess it should be mentioned, but that's something I'd like some consensus on. Would you like me to mention it on the Abortion talk page? - RoyBoy 01:15, 28 May 2007 (UTC)