Misplaced Pages

Talk:Darker: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:33, 31 May 2007 editJHunterJ (talk | contribs)Administrators105,776 edits valid DAB content: the list isn't needed at all← Previous edit Revision as of 15:31, 31 May 2007 edit undoEep² (talk | contribs)7,014 edits valid DAB content: lists ''are'' encyclopedicNext edit →
Line 21: Line 21:


::Do you know how incredibly anal and stupid this is? Having to create a separate list just for things with "darker" in their titles is just idiotic and moronic. ∞] <sup>(]|])</sup> 13:21, 31 May 2007 (UTC) ::Do you know how incredibly anal and stupid this is? Having to create a separate list just for things with "darker" in their titles is just idiotic and moronic. ∞] <sup>(]|])</sup> 13:21, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

:::The eventual point is that having a list of things with "darker" in their titles is unneeded. A separate article should not be created; it's not encyclopedic. Enter "darker" in the search box and hit "Search" instead of "Go" to get or use a Google search "site:en.wikipedia.org intitle:darker" . And, again, be civil. -- ] 13:33, 31 May 2007 (UTC) :::The eventual point is that having a list of things with "darker" in their titles is unneeded. A separate article should not be created; it's not encyclopedic. Enter "darker" in the search box and hit "Search" instead of "Go" to get or use a Google search "site:en.wikipedia.org intitle:darker" . And, again, be civil. -- ] 13:33, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

::::Wrong. "Darker" in a search doesn't yield all articles with "darker" in their titles in a quick and concise way as a ] does and ''is'' as encylcopedic as ''any'' other list. Be civil yourself, and stop harrassing me about these basic common sense-issue things. Looks like I need to bring ] into this growing debate... ∞] <sup>(]|])</sup> 15:31, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:31, 31 May 2007

valid DAB content

All of these things are valid on a DAB page as having a common title (in this case "Darker"):

Darker may be a part of:

Music

Television

ΣɛÞ² 00:02, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

But none of those are titled "Darker". See WP:D#Lists. -- JHunterJ 00:10, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Do you know how incredibly anal and stupid this is? Having to create a separate list just for things with "darker" in their titles is just idiotic and moronic. ∞ΣɛÞ² 13:21, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
The eventual point is that having a list of things with "darker" in their titles is unneeded. A separate article should not be created; it's not encyclopedic. Enter "darker" in the search box and hit "Search" instead of "Go" to get this list or use a Google search "site:en.wikipedia.org intitle:darker" like this. And, again, be civil. -- JHunterJ 13:33, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Wrong. "Darker" in a search doesn't yield all articles with "darker" in their titles in a quick and concise way as a list does and is as encylcopedic as any other list. Be civil yourself, and stop harrassing me about these basic common sense-issue things. Looks like I need to bring Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Lists into this growing debate... ∞ΣɛÞ² 15:31, 31 May 2007 (UTC)