Revision as of 20:56, 1 June 2007 editGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits Re: Mudaliar | Revision as of 00:21, 2 June 2007 edit undoIsotope23 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,870 edits replyNext edit → | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Re : Since I don't know much about the topic (only that it's a very heated topic), I would recommend that you post your request for page protection at ]. The two vulgar trolls from today were blocked by another admin. {{User|203.101.45.171}} appears to have stopped for the day. Since the vandalism and edit warring are very complex and the topic rather heated, I would recommend that you leave a note on ] explaining the situation should the person return. -- ] 20:56, 1 June 2007 (UTC) | Re : Since I don't know much about the topic (only that it's a very heated topic), I would recommend that you post your request for page protection at ]. The two vulgar trolls from today were blocked by another admin. {{User|203.101.45.171}} appears to have stopped for the day. Since the vandalism and edit warring are very complex and the topic rather heated, I would recommend that you leave a note on ] explaining the situation should the person return. -- ] 20:56, 1 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
:yes... it is fine to just cite the book.--] 00:21, 2 June 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:21, 2 June 2007
Re: Mudaliar
Re your message: Since I don't know much about the topic (only that it's a very heated topic), I would recommend that you post your request for page protection at WP:RFPP. The two vulgar trolls from today were blocked by another admin. 203.101.45.171 (talk · contribs) appears to have stopped for the day. Since the vandalism and edit warring are very complex and the topic rather heated, I would recommend that you leave a note on WP:ANI explaining the situation should the person return. -- Gogo Dodo 20:56, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- yes... it is fine to just cite the book.--Isotope23 00:21, 2 June 2007 (UTC)