Misplaced Pages

User talk:Baccarat: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:21, 2 June 2007 editIsotope23 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,870 edits reply← Previous edit Revision as of 19:03, 5 June 2007 edit undoIsotope23 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,870 edits commentNext edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
Re : Since I don't know much about the topic (only that it's a very heated topic), I would recommend that you post your request for page protection at ]. The two vulgar trolls from today were blocked by another admin. {{User|203.101.45.171}} appears to have stopped for the day. Since the vandalism and edit warring are very complex and the topic rather heated, I would recommend that you leave a note on ] explaining the situation should the person return. -- ] 20:56, 1 June 2007 (UTC) Re : Since I don't know much about the topic (only that it's a very heated topic), I would recommend that you post your request for page protection at ]. The two vulgar trolls from today were blocked by another admin. {{User|203.101.45.171}} appears to have stopped for the day. Since the vandalism and edit warring are very complex and the topic rather heated, I would recommend that you leave a note on ] explaining the situation should the person return. -- ] 20:56, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
:yes... it is fine to just cite the book.--] 00:21, 2 June 2007 (UTC) :yes... it is fine to just cite the book.--] 00:21, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
:I don't want to protect the article because the edits are not happening there and I am loathe to protect a talkpage unless it is absolutely necessary; given the fact that this is one IP being disruptive I don't think protection is warrented. I've warned the IP and if it continues I will block the IP to prevent continued vandalism.--] 19:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:03, 5 June 2007

Re: Mudaliar

Re your message: Since I don't know much about the topic (only that it's a very heated topic), I would recommend that you post your request for page protection at WP:RFPP. The two vulgar trolls from today were blocked by another admin. 203.101.45.171 (talk · contribs) appears to have stopped for the day. Since the vandalism and edit warring are very complex and the topic rather heated, I would recommend that you leave a note on WP:ANI explaining the situation should the person return. -- Gogo Dodo 20:56, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

yes... it is fine to just cite the book.--Isotope23 00:21, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
I don't want to protect the article because the edits are not happening there and I am loathe to protect a talkpage unless it is absolutely necessary; given the fact that this is one IP being disruptive I don't think protection is warrented. I've warned the IP and if it continues I will block the IP to prevent continued vandalism.--Isotope23 19:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)