Misplaced Pages

Neuro-linguistic programming: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:40, 3 August 2002 view sourceEnchanter (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,189 edits Copyedit, title← Previous edit Revision as of 06:06, 3 August 2002 view source Enchanter (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,189 edits Adding paragraph on criticisms of NLPNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Neurolinguistic programming''', or '''NLP''' is the empirical study of, and modelling of, human excellence. It was begun by ] and ] in the 1970s. It looks at precisely how we do what we do, and how highly successful individuals do what they do. The purpose is to enable portability and replication of those skills. '''Neurolinguistic programming''', or '''NLP''' is the empirical study of, and modelling of, human excellence. It was begun by ] and ] in the 1970s. It looks at precisely how we do what we do, and how highly successful individuals do what they do. The purpose is to enable portability and replication of those skills.

Critics of NLP assert that the majority of methods taught as part of NLP have not been scientifically verified. The manner in which NLP has been promoted has also frequently come in for criticism. Practitioners of NLP are sometimes accused of being secretive about techniques and only making them available through expensive courses, making it hard to assess the validity of the techniques.

Revision as of 06:06, 3 August 2002

Neurolinguistic programming, or NLP is the empirical study of, and modelling of, human excellence. It was begun by Richard Bandler and John Grinder in the 1970s. It looks at precisely how we do what we do, and how highly successful individuals do what they do. The purpose is to enable portability and replication of those skills.

Critics of NLP assert that the majority of methods taught as part of NLP have not been scientifically verified. The manner in which NLP has been promoted has also frequently come in for criticism. Practitioners of NLP are sometimes accused of being secretive about techniques and only making them available through expensive courses, making it hard to assess the validity of the techniques.