Misplaced Pages

User talk:Woohookitty: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →
Revision as of 10:43, 7 June 2007 editWoohookitty (talk | contribs)Administrators611,225 editsm Reverted edits by I HEREBY AWARD WOOHOOKITTY A BARNSTAR! (talk) to last version by Jamesclemow← Previous edit Revision as of 10:43, 7 June 2007 edit undoWoohookitty (talk | contribs)Administrators611,225 editsm Protected User talk:Woohookitty: will make this brief (expires 00:00, 8 June 2007 (UTC))Next edit →
(No difference)

Revision as of 10:43, 7 June 2007

This is Woohookitty's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Archives

Ben Gatti

lol, sorry if I've been feeding the troll. I'll try to read up on the history a bit more. It looks pretty classic. theanphibian 05:45, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Wow, so now we all have a Renewable Energy Bias. Lovely... theanphibian 06:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
You guys do have lots of trouble with that one don't ya? theanphibian 05:54, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

GFDL on Image:VCRonaldNielStuart.jpg

Hi, Woohookitty. I noticed that you marked Image:VCRonaldNielStuart.jpg as GFDL in this edit. The image is currently used in an article that has been submitted to FAC. The image page does not contain any links to the source, so I cannot verify the copyright status. Did you find the image online when you applied the tag? If so, I'd appreciate it if you could add a link to the image page, or let me know where I can find it. Thanks, Pagrashtak 14:44, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. The discussion here might be helpful. Pagrashtak 23:13, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: Jordin Sparks image

Sorry, didn't get your message until just now. (With finals and things, haven't been logging on a lot.) Shall do my best to keep that thing off the article (in fact, had to remove it 5 seconds ago. -_-) MissMJ 01:04, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

recent activity block

I guess there wasn't much I could do. I did create a bit of a disruption in having a type of revert war. Thanks for looking in to it. --CyclePat 19:32, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Please take a look

Hello, since you seem to be aware of the issue I have filed an RfC on CyclePat. Please foloow this link if you are willing Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Cyclepat. Æon 03:02, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

CFD

Hi there! I was closing some CFDs and hit an edit conflict with you. Since I was editing by page rather than by section, this overwrote your changes. But it turns out that our closings are identical, so this should not be a problem; I'll restore them if this bothers you. Cheers, >Radiant< 10:52, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

User:RunningManCorporation

Hi; I hope you do not mind, but I inserted a {{usernameblock}} notice on the talk page of this user, whom you indefblocked as a username violation. It seemed to me that you might have overlooked it; please accept my apologies if you had not.--Anthony.bradbury 11:30, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

User Name

Your user name is funny. Do you like cats? King Lopez 10:06, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: Advice

Thanks for the helpful advice, and I'll keep that in mind, although I don't see the RfA passing at this point, unfortunately. hmwithtalk 05:18, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Orient-thai (talk · contribs)

Just a heads-up, the other articles being edited were subsidiaries of Orient Thai Airlines and the edits are pretty PR-ish (including phone numbers, websites, etc). I took it to WP:COIN...cheers. RJASE1 14:34, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Handitems

hi, I was looking forward to slapping an indef on this one, but you beat me to it, well done. jimfbleak 12:30, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:IWasAMaleWarBride.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:IWasAMaleWarBride.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Misplaced Pages articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:04, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Pole0000.png

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Pole0000.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Another Deng sock

I'll wager if you check on user:vividcover you will find he is a deng sock. Same edits to the same articles as last year. DMorpheus 13:21, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your tireless efforts fighting the vandals, especially when they hit my user page. Gaff 16:12, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

WP:RFArb

Just to let you know, a users filed a request for arbitration against you, I'm not sure how long it will last because it's fairly malformed and I don't really get what it's about. Best of luck! Ryan Postlethwaite 21:55, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Advice on articles

I respect the work you have done on the American Idol articles. So if I may, I would like to ask your advice on the America's Got Talent and seasons 1 and 2 articles. I don't know if you watch that show, but any comments would be appreciated. Thanks. Tinlinkin 00:28, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Yes, definitely. And the sad part is, some of that fancruft was added by me. :) I won't be following season 2 as much as I did season 1, but I'm still interested in whatever tidying up or overhaul is possible, even if it includes deletions. Tinlinkin 02:08, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Re:User:The strokes

Yes, that seems to be better. Thank you very much. Bsroiaadn 06:46, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Please just delete that list.

Why as an administrator are you allowing lies to be posted on the worldwide adjusted for inflation page?

Anyone can tell that the list is full of nothing but BS so why not just delete the page so it can stop spreading lies and confusing people?

Quick Change

How did those numbers get approved in the first place?

And that source (3) right after gone with the wind's total is not correct.

I clicked on it and it does not back up the inflated worldwide gross for the movie, it just backs up the domestic inflated gross. (once again, very misleading and a lie)

I know Titanic made a lot more than what it says on that list (and that star wars made a lot less) according to the BS way that list justifies it's mathematical formula.

So why can't I just change those 2 movie's grosses and leave the rest alone for now?

why did you delete "big yellow bitch"?

can you please just give me a few reasons?