| Revision as of 13:34, 9 June 2007 editYoSoyGuapo (talk | contribs)413 edits removed nonsense from vandal user← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:00, 9 June 2007 edit undoTiconderogaCCB (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users553 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| What the hell is you problem??? Do you lack any ability to reason? I have tried endlessly to engage you on discussion and talk pages, but instead you act like a 12 year old (which you quite possibly could be). Why do you continue to revert to an absurd version of the St. John's article? Did you get denied admission, are you a UConn fan, or do you just enjoy insulting and degrading an institution that many people care about and that has done many more positive things than your article wishes to convey? I do not want an article that reflects "academic boosterism", I simply want an article that is neutral and accurate. Can we please work toward that ends? --] 14:00, 9 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Helpme - 5 pillars == | == Helpme - 5 pillars == | ||
Revision as of 14:00, 9 June 2007
What the hell is you problem??? Do you lack any ability to reason? I have tried endlessly to engage you on discussion and talk pages, but instead you act like a 12 year old (which you quite possibly could be). Why do you continue to revert to an absurd version of the St. John's article? Did you get denied admission, are you a UConn fan, or do you just enjoy insulting and degrading an institution that many people care about and that has done many more positive things than your article wishes to convey? I do not want an article that reflects "academic boosterism", I simply want an article that is neutral and accurate. Can we please work toward that ends? --TiconderogaCCB 14:00, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Helpme - 5 pillars
need someone to give me a template of pillars or wikipedia
- Here is a link to the page: Misplaced Pages:Five pillars.--Commander Keane 20:38, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, YoSoyGuapo, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --TTalk to me 21:53, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
May 2007
Thank you for making a report on Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Misplaced Pages and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, personal attacks are not vandalism, and should be reported to the Administrators' noticeboard. Thank you!--TTalk to me 20:17, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
pretty interesting. YoSoyGuapo 22:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
WP:AIV Request
Thank you for making a report about 24.199.88.22 (talk · contribs · block log) on Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Misplaced Pages and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Edits by User:24.199.88.22 seem more like an edit war than vandalism -- wrp103 (Bill Pringle) 02:03, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/Platanogenius
As you have added several suspects to the casefile, I encourage you to post in the evidence section of the casefile if you want them investigated. I have only provided evidence for the original three I posted, so it may weaken the case if we have that many suspects with no additional evidence. If we're going to do this, we should make sure we get it right so the article can continue in peace.--Rosicrucian 23:20, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- Also as a reminder, if you add users to the case, you have to notify them on their talkpage as I've done so far, so they know about the case and can defend themselves if they want.--Rosicrucian 00:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Check user procedure
You recently compiled and listed a case at requests for checkuser. A checkuser or clerk has requested you supply one or more diffs to justify the use of the checkuser procedure in the case, in accordance with the procedures listed in the table at the top of the requests for checkuser page. For an outcome to be achieved, we require that you provide these diffs as soon as possible. This has been implemented to reduce difficulties for checkusers, and is essential for your case to be processed. A link to your recently-created case which has this information missing is here. Thanks for your co-operation. -- lucasbfr 07:53, 1 June 2007 (UTC), checkuser clerk.
Reporting sockpuppets
I removed your report for blocking sock puppets from WP:AIV. For future references, please report all sock puppets at Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets. Thanks. —Imdanumber1 (talk · contribs) 17:15, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry about the block report, I noticed that the user was already reported as a sock but persisted on vandalizing. Sorry about that. --Imdanumber1 (talk · contribs) 19:56, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- Sure, no probs. —Imdanumber1 (talk · contribs) 03:08, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Your RFCU request
Hi! I wanted to let you know that I've moved your Checkuser request from Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Jimmyjones1122 to an existing request at Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Memeco. Your request had these 4 users:
- Jimmyjones1122 -- added to the request
- Memeco -- already confirmed
- Jonathanmbaez -- already confirmed
- EdwinCasadoBaez -- added to the request
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask me, and you also may want to watchlist the new request. Thanks! --ST47Talk 00:26, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
you dont understand
is not that i go against the block...is more than that!i wanted to tell you that they are other users doing reverts and things that are no good at all and that they dont get blocked..but the ones that actually want to do something in this articles and they have done a lot in other articles, they are the ones that get blocked...If you see my contributions and then you see the annonymous IP's contributions you will notice that i have done lot more than other people here!and then i get blocked!this is What gets me angry..please try to realise the situation the Dominican Article is going by right now!You'll understand!Hopefully you do!69.119.127.181 07:29, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Hey
I'm trying so hard not to be desruptive!!!i havent done one disruptive comment!!!i'm discussing different topics!see the talk page!!c'mon...why are you doing this?Dont you see what i'm writing right now!I am discussing a sub-heading of the dominican article called dominican-hatian wars...i havent written anything distuptive!I am just stating my views!!i havent written any personal attacks as i promised and i havent written nothing against my fellow wikipedians!!Read over and you'll see it!!!Check it again bro!....is to hard for me not to edit!!!i love wikipedia and i cant stop discussing topics!!is a great way for me to discuss an idea!but the problem is that when i get acussed of something i have to react...and sometimes i react negatively!69.119.127.181 06:41, 6 June 2007 (UTC)