User talk:Lilkunta: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 13:11, 10 June 2007 editOnly (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users32,384 edits declined← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:20, 10 June 2007 edit undoAuburnPilot (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users27,289 edits I got that one wrong....support declineNext edit →
Line 11:		Line 11:
	{{Unblock reviewed\|As usual the orig block from ] was wrong. I didnt delete the comments. They were archived. Also, '''admin OTHER THAN review b/c 'metros' is bias'''. Thx.\|decline=You were not blocked for removing comments you were blocked for: "For disruption of Misplaced Pages after several blocks and multiple warnings as well as a complete reluctance to cooperate." This is a very true statement and has nothing to do with your archiving of warnings. Please come back with a legitimate reason for unblock that addresses the problems raised. ] 13:11, 10 June 2007 (UTC)}}		{{Unblock reviewed\|As usual the orig block from ] was wrong. I didnt delete the comments. They were archived. Also, '''admin OTHER THAN review b/c 'metros' is bias'''. Thx.\|decline=You were not blocked for removing comments you were blocked for: "For disruption of Misplaced Pages after several blocks and multiple warnings as well as a complete reluctance to cooperate." This is a very true statement and has nothing to do with your archiving of warnings. Please come back with a legitimate reason for unblock that addresses the problems raised. ] 13:11, 10 June 2007 (UTC)}}
	:Will you agree to stop using all forms of nonstandard color and font outside of this talk page (User talk:Lilkunta)? It doesn't matter who says they are "ok with it," because even those of us who are not "ok with it" still have to read what you've written. If you agree, are unblocked, and continue to use a nonstandard font or color, you will be reblocked. Also, you're going to need to fully understand that your user and user talk pages are not a place for your political ]. Note that ] is not tolerated. No ] edit is vandalism, and users leaving you warnings about your actions certainly are not vandalizing this page. - ''']''' ] 18:12, 9 June 2007 (UTC)		:Will you agree to stop using all forms of nonstandard color and font outside of this talk page (User talk:Lilkunta)? It doesn't matter who says they are "ok with it," because even those of us who are not "ok with it" still have to read what you've written. If you agree, are unblocked, and continue to use a nonstandard font or color, you will be reblocked. Also, you're going to need to fully understand that your user and user talk pages are not a place for your political ]. Note that ] is not tolerated. No ] edit is vandalism, and users leaving you warnings about your actions certainly are not vandalizing this page. - ''']''' ] 18:12, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
			I support ]'s decline, because you clearly can't grasp ] of editing. I leave you an out, a way to be unblocked, and you turn it into a threat. Clearly my assumption of good faith here was wasted. - ''']''' ] 18:20, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:20, 10 June 2007

: I asked 4 admins aside from metros bc of bias/threats like this :

Will you agree to stop using all forms of nonstandard color and font outside of this talk page (User talk:Lilkunta)? It doesn't matter who says they are "ok with it," because even those of us who are not "ok with it" still have to read what you've written. If you agree, are unblocked, and continue to use a nonstandard font or color, you will be reblocked. Also, you're going to need to fully understand that your user and user talk pages are not a place for your political grandstanding. Note that incivility is not tolerated. No good faith edit is vandalism, and users leaving you warnings about your actions certainly are not vandalizing this page. - auburnpilot talk 18:12, 9 June 2007 (UTC)}}

Replies like this sound 2 me liek the reviewer isnt checking all the involved info.

What is uncivil is others editing my talk page to how they want it to look.

What is uncivil is make false charges when if the person had looked they would have seen that I didnt delete; I archived. Positive & negative criticism is a part of life.

The so called 'good faith' edits were not in good faith IMO bc doing a little looking b4 leaping, 'Darth' & all the others will c the comments. I archived the comments bc they were lengthening my talk page. Lilkunta 12:48, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lilkunta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As usual the orig block from User:Darthgriz98 was wrong. I didnt delete the comments. They were archived. Also, admin OTHER THAN review b/c 'metros' is bias. Thx.

Decline reason:

You were not blocked for removing comments you were blocked for: "For disruption of Misplaced Pages after several blocks and multiple warnings as well as a complete reluctance to cooperate." This is a very true statement and has nothing to do with your archiving of warnings. Please come back with a legitimate reason for unblock that addresses the problems raised. Metros 13:11, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I support Metros's decline, because you clearly can't grasp the most concepts of editing. I leave you an out, a way to be unblocked, and you turn it into a threat. Clearly my assumption of good faith here was wasted. - auburnpilot talk 18:20, 10 June 2007 (UTC)