| Revision as of 17:23, 13 June 2007 editTheRingess (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers23,992 edits created discussion section, added my opening comments← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:27, 13 June 2007 edit undoTheRingess (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers23,992 editsm →Opening Statement from TheRingess: fixed redlinks added to discussionNext edit → | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| === Discussion === | === Discussion === | ||
| ====Opening Statement from TheRingess==== | ====Opening Statement from TheRingess==== | ||
| There has already been much discussion about this case on ]. I'm going to try to cover briefly those topics discussed there and add some new info. I am not engaged in ] (already covered). I am more than a little concerned that there is some ] going on here. This has already been brought up but not discussed. | There has already been much discussion about this case on ]. I'm going to try to cover briefly those topics discussed there and add some new info. I am not engaged in ] (already covered). I am more than a little concerned that there is some ] going on here. This has already been brought up but not discussed. | ||
| Regading the ] article, I made one edit . This was not a deletion nor was it destructive, this was an edit designed to standardize the references in the article. | Regading the ] article, I made one edit . This was not a deletion nor was it destructive, this was an edit designed to standardize the references in the article. | ||
| Regarding the |
Regarding the Shakti mantras article, I brought this to ] because it seemed like original research to me. I forgot to notify Sardaka about the AFD, but he did discover it in plenty of time to comment. Since Sardaka has brought up concerns regarding the AFD process, his concerns might be better addressed in a ] rather than a mediation case. | ||
| Regarding the ] article; a couple of editors have already reviewed my contributions to that article and concluded that I did not violate policy with my contributions. Since Sardaka described my contributions as "unnecessary deletions", I think we can best address his concerns by examining specific edits to that article that I made. In that way, we can all discuss them and revert any that we all deem as unnecessary. | Regarding the ] article; a couple of editors have already reviewed my contributions to that article and concluded that I did not violate policy with my contributions. Since Sardaka described my contributions as "unnecessary deletions", I think we can best address his concerns by examining specific edits to that article that I made. In that way, we can all discuss them and revert any that we all deem as unnecessary. I am concerned about hist statement that I made those edits before he had time to "finish" this article. I believe that disallowing any user from editing an article "before it is finished" violates Misplaced Pages policy. | ||
| I'm confident that we can clear up any misunderstandings through this mediation process. | I'm confident that we can clear up any misunderstandings through this mediation process. | ||
Revision as of 17:27, 13 June 2007
| Misplaced Pages Mediation Cabal | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Status | open |
| Request date | Unknown |
| Requesting party | Unknown |
| Mediator(s) | Addhoc |
| Comment | Opening case |
]]
Request Information
Who are the involved parties?
Sardaka, TheRingess
What is the involved article(s)?
Depression and natural therapies
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Shakti mantras
What's going on?
TheRingess is following me around, always turning up magically as soon as I write an article, frequently making unnecessary deletions, in one case before I had even finished writing the article.
What would you like to change about that?
I want someone to tell her to stop following me around, and to stop making unnecessary deletions.
Mediator response
Administrative notes
Discussion
Opening Statement from TheRingess
There has already been much discussion about this case on User Talk:Sardaka. I'm going to try to cover briefly those topics discussed there and add some new info. I am not engaged in stalking (already covered). I am more than a little concerned that there is some ownership going on here. This has already been brought up but not discussed.
Regading the Depression and natural therapies article, I made one edit . This was not a deletion nor was it destructive, this was an edit designed to standardize the references in the article.
Regarding the Shakti mantras article, I brought this to AFD because it seemed like original research to me. I forgot to notify Sardaka about the AFD, but he did discover it in plenty of time to comment. Since Sardaka has brought up concerns regarding the AFD process, his concerns might be better addressed in a deletion review rather than a mediation case.
Regarding the Gurudev Siddha Peeth article; a couple of editors have already reviewed my contributions to that article and concluded that I did not violate policy with my contributions. Since Sardaka described my contributions as "unnecessary deletions", I think we can best address his concerns by examining specific edits to that article that I made. In that way, we can all discuss them and revert any that we all deem as unnecessary. I am concerned about hist statement that I made those edits before he had time to "finish" this article. I believe that disallowing any user from editing an article "before it is finished" violates Misplaced Pages policy.
I'm confident that we can clear up any misunderstandings through this mediation process.