| Revision as of 10:30, 14 June 2007 editSuva (talk | contribs)1,238 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:30, 14 June 2007 edit undoAlexia Death (talk | contribs)1,658 edits →Target of religious prosecutionNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| Please don't put this prosecution text back. It's definitely not a place for the disambiguation page. The problem is more complex, and it should be discussed on the main article controversy section. Adding this text here is just childish mud throwing and serves no good purpose in ecyclopedia. ] 10:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC) | Please don't put this prosecution text back. It's definitely not a place for the disambiguation page. The problem is more complex, and it should be discussed on the main article controversy section. Adding this text here is just childish mud throwing and serves no good purpose in ecyclopedia. ] 10:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == Please dont put the POV text back on this page== | |||
| Put it in the articles where they are countered in sensibel fashon. Current form is completley neutral, sol ets agree on not messing with it?--] 11:30, 14 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:30, 14 June 2007
Target of religious prosecution
The story of religious persecution is not even POV; it's just plain wrong.
The facts of the matter are that the Moscow Patriarchate's church attempted to get itself registered under the very same name already used by the Constantinople Patriarchate's church. Name duplication is not allowed by law, and for a good reason -- and the church refused for years to consider having another name, instead finding it more profitable to make nonsense claims of persecution in media. Digwuren 07:05, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Please don't put this prosecution text back. It's definitely not a place for the disambiguation page. The problem is more complex, and it should be discussed on the main article controversy section. Adding this text here is just childish mud throwing and serves no good purpose in ecyclopedia. Suva 10:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Please dont put the POV text back on this page
Put it in the articles where they are countered in sensibel fashon. Current form is completley neutral, sol ets agree on not messing with it?--Alexia Death 11:30, 14 June 2007 (UTC)