Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
In the quantitative theory of money article, this user slamdiego insists on pretending that the cause for moving from the transaction form of the equation to one based on final expenditures is lack of data on other transactions. His austrian faith clearly bars him from having an honest position on the subject. And once It will be clear to me on what ground a complaint should be made to the administrators and how to do it, I will do so as such a behaviour is clearly despicable.
In the quantitative theory of money article, this user slamdiego insists on pretending that the cause for moving from the transaction form of the equation to one based on final expenditures is lack of data on other transactions. His austrian faith clearly bars him from having an honest position on the subject. And once It will be clear to me on what ground a complaint should be made to the administrators and how to do it, I will do so as such a behaviour is clearly despicable. {{unsigned|Panache|Panache}}
Please don't confuse a datum lacking a footnote with one that is necessarily unsourced. (Note now that most of the article on Willem Mengelbergremains unfootnoted.)
Please use the {{fact}} tag, rather than summarily removing content that is-or-is-believed to be unsourced. The tag can provoke helpful edits from users who would otherwise not know that they can make a contribution, and it means that intermediate edits don't foul what should be a simple process.
yes, but there's no sense in permitting more unreferenced data just because the rest of it is unsourced. anyway the point is moot, as i provided the necessary link myself. --emerson7 | Talk16:50, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
You provided a footnote from a source that was already provided at the end of the article (by me). Meanwhile, the rest of the article is unfootnoted, yet sourced. —SlamDiego←T11:08, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
In the quantitative theory of money article, this user slamdiego insists on pretending that the cause for moving from the transaction form of the equation to one based on final expenditures is lack of data on other transactions. His austrian faith clearly bars him from having an honest position on the subject. And once It will be clear to me on what ground a complaint should be made to the administrators and how to do it, I will do so as such a behaviour is clearly despicable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Panache (talk • contribs) Panache (UTC)
