| Revision as of 02:50, 3 September 2003 editFuzheado (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, IP block exemptions, Administrators51,190 editsNo edit summary | Revision as of 03:50, 3 September 2003 edit undo67.251.130.77 (talk) The article tries to show WHY Ann Coulter is controversial.Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| So the neutrality of this page is disputed, but there are no comments here. Anyone care to chime in? ] 02:50, 3 Sep 2003 (UTC) | So the neutrality of this page is disputed, but there are no comments here. Anyone care to chime in? ] 02:50, 3 Sep 2003 (UTC) | ||
| == The article tries to show WHY Ann Coulter is controversial. == | |||
| The article tries to show WHY Ann Coulter is controversial. | |||
| You can't do that by quoting her non-controversial remarks.. | |||
| So yes, the article selects her controversial remarks, but an article on Ann Coulter which didn't do so would be uninformative. | |||
Revision as of 03:50, 3 September 2003
So the neutrality of this page is disputed, but there are no comments here. Anyone care to chime in? Fuzheado 02:50, 3 Sep 2003 (UTC)
The article tries to show WHY Ann Coulter is controversial.
The article tries to show WHY Ann Coulter is controversial.
You can't do that by quoting her non-controversial remarks..
So yes, the article selects her controversial remarks, but an article on Ann Coulter which didn't do so would be uninformative.