| Revision as of 21:23, 16 June 2007 editSemperf (talk | contribs)7,465 edits 3rr warning | Revision as of 21:33, 16 June 2007 edit undoSemperf (talk | contribs)7,465 edits responseNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{{icon|] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a ] among editors. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] 21:23, 16 June 2007 (UTC) | {{{icon|] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a ] among editors. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] 21:23, 16 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *Thanks for your message. If you are correct, you'll surely be able to cite some ] that makes the same point. ] 21:33, 16 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:33, 16 June 2007
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. semper fictilis 21:23, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message. If you are correct, you'll surely be able to cite some scholarly source that makes the same point. semper fictilis 21:33, 16 June 2007 (UTC)