Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 16:12, 18 June 2007

India Unassessed

This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia ??? This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

terrorist

SATP lists it as such. SATP is a reliable source.Bakaman 06:23, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Request to Unprotect

It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Tamil Nadu Muslim Munnetra Kazhagam. (edit · history · last · links · protection log) This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y". The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

• The article stands protected at the POV version of Baka. Can you please revert it to the last stable version of Alverstrand here
• Can you please add the following link and sentence: TMMK awarded the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu for social cohesion efforts.

Anwar 12:17, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

As a matter of general policy we do not revert pages except in extreme circumstances. Please use the time that the page is protected to contact the other editors and try to reach a compromise. I don't think it is soon enough yet to unprotect the page, since I see no evidence here that the content has been discussed. — Carl (CBM · talk) 15:48, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Does that mean, the article will continue to stand protected at the POV version of Bakasuprman who is a subject of a ongoing ArbCom case? I was reverting vandalism. I removed links to fundamentalist websites and copyvio images. SATP is a fundamentalist website. None of the articles published therein seem to be well-sourced. TMMK was awarded numerous times by the Governor of Tamil Nadu for their social schemes. You can google easily for supporting links. TMMK is not a political party. TMMK literally means Tamil Nadu Muslim Progress Movement. They awarded the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu for social cohesion efforts. TMMK is the spokesman for minorities in Tamil Nadu. They are well-known for organising mass rallies for affirmation action. In a recent rally in Chennai, atleast 1 million Muslims participated (out of a total population of 4 million). TMMK also fought for compensation and concessions to non-Muslim victims of tsunami. There are very few organisations like TMMK that work for social unity. By tagging them as fundamentalist, Baka was pushing hysterical POV with fake tags in edit summary. He was revert warring despite being a subject of a ongoing ArbCom case.

How long will the article be protected (at his POV version) without any updates or news links? Should I wait until Bakasuprman is acquitted in the ongoing ArbCom case? Anwar 16:12, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

• Unassessed India articles
• Unknown-importance India articles
• Unassessed-Class India articles of Unknown-importance
• WikiProject India articles
• Misplaced Pages semi-protected edit requests
• Misplaced Pages edit requests possibly using incorrect templates