| Revision as of 21:51, 20 June 2007 editWangi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,711 edits →Your reverts of [] article: blocked for 48hr← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:34, 21 June 2007 edit undoIlya1166 (talk | contribs)2,100 edits →Your reverts of [] articleNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| <div style="padding:5px; border:1px solid #c0c090; background-color:#FEC;" class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for {{{{{subst|}}}#if:48 hours|a period of '''48 hours'''|a short time}} in accordance with ] for violating the ] {{{{{subst|}}}#if:Estonia|on ]}}. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek ] rather than engaging in an ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:] 21:51, 20 June 2007 (UTC)|] 21:51, 20 June 2007 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> | <div style="padding:5px; border:1px solid #c0c090; background-color:#FEC;" class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for {{{{{subst|}}}#if:48 hours|a period of '''48 hours'''|a short time}} in accordance with ] for violating the ] {{{{{subst|}}}#if:Estonia|on ]}}. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek ] rather than engaging in an ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:] 21:51, 20 June 2007 (UTC)|] 21:51, 20 June 2007 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> | ||
| {{unblock|ridiculous logic and claims made by the opposing editors}} | |||
Revision as of 14:34, 21 June 2007
World War II
Stop reverting in that article. Though I agree with your stance I have to note you are violating the triple revert policy. Lets try and solve this on the talkpage and avoid getting you blocked over this issue.--Caranorn 13:22, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- Seriously, knock it off. I had you reported only a few days ago for 3RR violation, and you're already back at it again. It doesn't matter that you're right (which you are) - this needs to stop. Bring it up at WT:MILHIST, if you must, but stop this 3RR. I would have reported you again for a longer block, had the assertions you removed not been so obviously and blatantly false. The Evil Spartan 16:55, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Sourced - Unsourced
Please don't remove sourced texts by claiming they are unsourced. Please read the references first. Thanks.
Also stop categorizing baltic states as "Russian speaking" although we have russian speaking residents, the countries don't qualify as russian speaking. Better category would be "Countries with russian speaking minority". Thanks. Suva 12:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- You have broken WP:3RR, please stop edit warring and let's discuss it instead. Or I have to report you. Thank you. Suva 13:42, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Please see . Such categories are, quote, "to categorize countries per official language". Cheers, --3 Löwi 13:57, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
As a comparison, would you categorise Russian Federation among Category:Countries using US dollar for internal business? Digwuren 14:17, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Such a category doesn't even exist--Ilya1166 14:21, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Perhaps not yet ;-) Digwuren 17:24, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Article of the day
Спасибо. Это очень интересная тема. А вы того читали? -- Дигвурен 17:24, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Your reverts of Estonia article
Hi Ilya, since you seem to be relatively new to English wikipedia, I hope you'll not mind a piece of advice from me (and by no means am I trying to patronise you). You have reverted several other editors today, adding the Category:Russian-speaking countries and territories to the Estonia article. Please consider not doing this. Reverting is not the way to go on wikipedia, especially when you are aware that a number of other editors oppose your edit. It's almost always better to discuss in such cases. Also, I have noticed that you have reverted the article more than 3 times today. If you are not familiar with it already, take a peek at Misplaced Pages:Three-revert rule policy, as reverting more than 3 times is prohibited on wikipedia. Thanks for considering this and happy editing. --Lysy 20:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- He has been warned several times about this... The Evil Spartan 21:28, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Ilya1166 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
ridiculous logic and claims made by the opposing editorsNotes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=ridiculous logic and claims made by the opposing editors |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=ridiculous logic and claims made by the opposing editors |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=ridiculous logic and claims made by the opposing editors |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}