| Revision as of 16:38, 20 May 2005 editUser2004 (talk | contribs)23,415 edits rv undescribed deletions - please use edit summary or talk page← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:44, 20 May 2005 edit undoIan Pitchford (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers30,648 edits rv changes: two introductory sentences listing the same degrees are note useful; the book has not generated "a storm of debate with in the scientific community"; quotations are pointless.Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''John Corrigan "Jonathan" Wells''' |
'''John Corrigan "Jonathan" Wells''' is a ] and supporter of ] theory. | ||
| After graduating the ] in 1978, |
After graduating the ] in 1978, Wells earned for two doctorates - one in theology at ] and the other in molecular and cell biology at the University of California at Berkeley. Wells is a Fellow of the Discovery Institute's ]. | ||
| In 2001, Wells wrote the book '']'' discussing ten examples of fraud in the promotion and teaching of the ]. The book has caused a storm of debate with in the scientific community. For a list of critiques and Well's responses, see '']''. | |||
| ==Quotes== | |||
| * "Empirical science requires theories, somehow and at some point, to be compared with evidence. Prudence will dictate that theories long established should not be changed for light and transient causes. But when a long train of exaggerations and distortions evinces a desire to promote an idea regardless of the evidence, then it is our right, it is our duty, to criticize that idea as a philosophical doctrine rather than a scientific theory." | |||
| * "]'s words, my studies, and my prayers convinced me that I should devote my life to destroying ], just as many of my fellow Unificationists had already devoted their lives to destroying ]." | |||
| * "As a graduate student at Yale, I studied the whole of Christian theology but focused my attention on the Darwinian controversies. I wanted to get to the root of the conflict between Darwinian evolution and Christian doctrine. In the course of my research I learned (to my surprise) that biblical chronology played almost no role in the 19th-century controversies, since most theologians had already accepted geological evidence for the age of the earth and re-interpreted the days in Genesis as long periods of time. Instead, the central issue was design." | |||
| * "All the ] pictures were staged ... Scientists have known since the 1980s that the moths do not normally rest on tree trunks." | |||
| In 2001, Wells wrote the book ], which discusses ten examples used in the teaching of the ]. | |||
| == External links == | == External links == | ||
Revision as of 16:44, 20 May 2005
John Corrigan "Jonathan" Wells is a biologist and supporter of Intelligent Design theory.
After graduating the Unification Theological Seminary in 1978, Wells earned for two doctorates - one in theology at Yale University and the other in molecular and cell biology at the University of California at Berkeley. Wells is a Fellow of the Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture.
In 2001, Wells wrote the book Icons of Evolution: Science or Myth? Why Much of What We Teach About Evolution is Wrong, which discusses ten examples used in the teaching of the theory of evolution.
External links
- Discovery Institute biography
- articles by Wells
- New Mexicans for Science and Reason debate Jonathan Wells
- ARN page with essays
- The Words of the Wells Family
- Talk Origins on Wells
- The antievolutionists - Wells
| Peppered moth | |
|---|---|
| Biology | |
| Writers and researchers | |
| Works | |
| Creative works | |