Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 16:12, 29 June 2007

Welcome!

Hello, Vanished user skj3ioo3jwifjsek35y, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  WilyD 16:14, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Steven Weinstock

The article Steven Weinstock has been speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Misplaced Pages. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Alabamaboy 11:03, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Please

Please see my note at Talk:Jew Watch#Polemics. Thanks. ←Humus sapiens 21:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

3RR

You're likely to be blocked soon for violating our 3RR policy, which says that editors may not revert more than three times in 24 hours. Please review it carefully at WP:3RR. Many thanks, SlimVirgin 22:48, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked

Heimstern Läufer 23:03, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

This block is totally unjustified.I have been added a section and important one that show the criticisms of Jew watch and that have been erased. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oren.tal (talk • contribs)

If you are really serious about participating in the project, may I suggest you spend some time learning about WP policies and improving your English (maybe get a spellchecker). ←Humus sapiens 23:24, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

You were warned about the three-revert rule, and then you just went ahead and reverted anyway. If you'd stopped after being warned, I'd have been hesitant to block you; since you continued, I had no hesitation about it. Heimstern Läufer 23:26, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

The blocked have used has a weapons to force opinion of you on other. I will complain about your policy.You should not use in the block as a weapons to force opinion but only against vandalism.I have not erased any part of this article but just add an important information that you have erased.Shame on you.You should not be administrator at all.

• Read WP:3RR until you understand it. Any of us would have been blocked for the same behaviour. --jpgordon 23:43, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

I mention true fact that the website quote the protocol and it was proved faked by the London time. Moreover you used the blocked as weapons in order to totally erase the criticisms.If you were honset you would have write your own version.but you did not. Instead you have used in blocking as a weapons.

• Hi. I've blocked the accounts you created to evade the 3RR block you were serving. Please do not do that again. Thank you. --jpgordon 23:43, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Moon God

Thanks for your note here where I have replied now. This moon god stuff is something which is really needed in Islam related articles. I'm sure there are many reliable sources that we can find for this. --Matt57 21:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi Oren, thanks for your reply! Well yes, I also feel the moon god stuff should be mentioned. I mean the biggest thing is that Islam's symbol is the crescent moon. Criticism of Islam has been slow to seep into Misplaced Pages for many reasons, mostly because people wont agree with our viewpoints but slowly things are getting better. Just see if you can find a university professor, or a news website or a book that talks about this moon god stuff and then like other statements, just put it in and reference it like the others. People said that the bibleprobe.com is not a reliable source, they may be right. A reliable source is one that comes from established sources of information (see WP:RS for more info). The way you can go about this is, search e.g. "moon god islam" in Google and Google books or Scholars and you might find some sources talking about it. Let me know if you find a source that you think was reliable but was removed by other people. You'll find lots of people who might oppose your changes and then let me know and I'll support you if the source is pretty reliable. Just stay free from blocks, 3rr, personal attacks, sock puppets and use the article's talk page and you should be safe. I hope you can find a good RS now for that moon god stuff, that will be a great addition to Islam related articles. I'm sure someone has said something about it somewhere. --Matt57 00:57, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

soapboxing

Welcome to Misplaced Pages! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Criticism of the Qur'an are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. Please refrain from doing this in the future. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ITAQALLAH 21:37, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

please stop misusing talk pages to propagate your own personal viewpoints. see WP:NOT#FORUM, and WP:TPG. if you have any real suggestion concerning how to improve the article, you may do it without the spamming. ITAQALLAH 21:45, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

You are making the arguments yourself there. All we do is report on the arguments made by reliable sources. Arrow740 09:29, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

June 2007

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Criticism of the Qur'an. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. → AA — 16:05, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

No.I am not part of any edit war.I removed the link to wikipedia.However as for the other link they are fine.