Misplaced Pages

Ordos culture: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:10, 5 July 2007 editPer Honor et Gloria (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers53,031 edits Book only published in Chinese: Chinese title added. Mention of Lebedynsky.← Previous edit Revision as of 05:11, 5 July 2007 edit undoEiorgiomugini (talk | contribs)7,059 edits There is no such rule.Next edit →
Line 21: Line 21:
].]] ].]]
] ]
Later, horse nomads occupied the area from the ] to the ] before being driven away by the ]. According to Iaroslav Lebedynsky, they are the easternmost people of Scythian affinity to have settled here, just to the east of the better-known ].<ref>"The Mongoloid types of the Transbaikal area and Central and Eastern Mongolia are strongly contrasted with the Europoid type displayed at the same time by the Scythian nomads occupying Western Mongolia and their predecessors of the Bronze age". "Les Saces", Lebedinsky, p125</ref> They are mainly known from their skeletal remains and artifacts. Later, horse nomads occupied the area from the ] to the ] before being driven away by the ]. According to Lebedynsky, they are thought to be the easternmost people of Scythian affinity to have settled here, just to the east of the better-known ], althought he provide no facts for it.<ref>"The Mongoloid types of the Transbaikal area and Central and Eastern Mongolia are strongly contrasted with the Europoid type displayed at the same time by the Scythian nomads occupying Western Mongolia and their predecessors of the Bronze age". "Les Saces", Lebedinsky, p125</ref> They are mainly known from their skeletal remains and artifacts.


They were in contact and often at war with the pre-Han and ] populations of the period. Their former territory is now located just north of the ] of China, and on the south bank of the northernmost hook of the ]. They were in contact and often at war with the pre-Han and ] populations of the period. Their former territory is now located just north of the ] of China, and on the south bank of the northernmost hook of the ].


The people represented in archaeological finds tend to display Europoïd features, and are thought to be of ] affinity.<ref>"Europoid faces in some depictions of the Ordos, which should be attributed to a Scythian affinity", Iaroslav Lebedynsky, p125</ref> The weapons, found in tombs throughout the steppes of the Ordos, are very close to those of the Scythians, especially the ].<ref>Iaroslav Lebedynsky, p127</ref> According to Lebedynsky, the people represented in archaeological finds tend to display Europoïd features, and are thought to be of ] affinity.<ref>"Europoid faces in some depictions of the Ordos, which should be attributed to a Scythian affinity", Iaroslav Lebedynsky, p125</ref> The Europoid faces exhibited on the artifacts might be captives and slaves captured by eastern nomads, or trading men from ]. They may have been related to ], a group of people described as Europoid in appearance and who lived in Ordos before being overrun by the Xiongnu in the ]. The Jie numbered 200,000 in population were completely exterminated by the Chinese in 350s, its been suggested that many of them were castrated.<ref>Ma 2005, p. 185-187</ref> According to Lebedynsky, the weapons, found in tombs throughout the steppes of the Ordos, are very close to those of the Scythians, especially the ].<ref>Iaroslav Lebedynsky, p127</ref>


The Ordos people manufactured belt plaques, horse gear and weapons depicting animals, often in combat. The "animal-style" is similar to nomadic traditions found in Central Asia, such as that of the ]. The Ordos people manufactured belt plaques, horse gear and weapons depicting animals, often in combat. The "animal-style" is similar to nomadic traditions found in Central Asia, such as that of the ].

According to ], the Europoid faces exhibited on the artifacts might be captives and slaves captured by eastern nomads, or trading men from ].{{cn}} They may have been related to ], a group of people described as Europoid in appearance and who lived in Ordos before being overrun by the Xiongnu in the ].{{cn}}


==Relationships== ==Relationships==
Line 60: Line 58:
*] permanent exhibition (China room). *] permanent exhibition (China room).
*"Les nomades" Iaroslav Lebedynsky, Editions Errance, Paris 2007, ISBN 9782877723466 *"Les nomades" Iaroslav Lebedynsky, Editions Errance, Paris 2007, ISBN 9782877723466
*马利清, "原匈奴、匈奴历史与文化的考古学探索" 专著 内蒙古大学出版社, 2005年. "Ma, Liqing (2005). ''The Original Xiongnu, An Archaeological Exploration of the Xiongnu's History and Culture''. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia University Press. ISBN 7-81074-796-7. *Ma, Liqing (2005). ''Original Xiongnu, An Archaeological Explore on the Xiongnu's History and Culture''. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia University Press. ISBN 7-81074-796-7.
*Huang, Weiwen, . '']'', 1st ed. *Huang, Weiwen, . '']'', 1st ed.
*Wuen, . '']'', 1st ed. *Wuen, . '']'', 1st ed.

Revision as of 05:11, 5 July 2007

Location of the archaeological finds of the Ordos culture.

The Ordos culture comprises the period from Upper Paleolithic to the late Bronze age at the Ordos Desert, in the south of the Inner Mongolian Autonomous Region of the People's Republic of China, about 300 kilometers from modern Beijing. The area of the Ordos were predominantly Mongoloid known from their skeletal remains and artifacts, but numerous interactions between Europoid and Mongoloid might had also taken place there over the course of several centuries, until its occupation by Qin and Han dynasties.

Prehistoric people

The Ordos culture is documented from the Upper Palaeolithic. They used the chopping and rock tools of the Zhoukoudian. The points and sides of their tools indicate a "Moustero-Levalloisian" element. They seemed to have a masterful knowledge of Upper Palaeolithic technology, producing blades as much as fifteen centimeters long.

The human fossil remains of the Ordos Man from Salawusu site dated between 50,000 and 35,000 BCE show strong Mongoloid features, specifically on the fore-tooth and occipital bone.

The Zhukaigou culture, is one of the neolithic culture at Ordos, dated between 2200 and 1500 BCE. It contained about 327 burials, recent genetic evidence shown that they were close related to the remains from Yinniugou, as well as modern populations like Daurs and Evenks. The archaeological finds at the site is very similiar to those of the lower Xiajiadian culture. Those finds are important as it was responsible for the development of snake pattern design on the decoration of weapon and depicting animal artifact, known in later as the Ordos style.

The Ordos people were located at the doorstep of Qin China, and were just east of the Yuezhi in the 3rd century BCE.

The people in Ordos are recorded in the area of the Ordos desert from the 6th century BCE to the 2nd century BCE. What kind of populations occupied the area before them is unclear, but may have been Mongoloid.

The skeletal remains at Taohongbala tomb dated to between 7th century and 6th century BCE are generally identified as belonging to the Xiongnu bronze culture, and show strong Mongoloid features.

A similar type of burial at Hulusitai around Bayannur uncovered in 1979, which is dated to between 5th century to 4th century BCE, is considered as the only Xiongnu's culture situated at the northern slope of Yinshan. The site consisted of mainly bronze artifacts and pottery and 27 horse skeletal remains. Further excavation in 1983 at Guoxianyaozi amounting to a total of 31 burials dated to about 6th century to 5th century BCE, showed strong north Mongoloid. Those features generally decreased towards the south, and skeletal remains of east and north Mongoloid can be seen from the finds in Maoqinggou and Yinniugou dated to around 7th century BCE, which amount to a total of 117 burials. Many bronze weapons of those cultures are similar to those of Chinese style.

Many depictions of the Ordos people tend to have straight hair. Those are especially strong in the archaeological finds at Baotou (M63:22, M63:23, M84:5) Etuoke (M1, M6), Xihaokou (M3), lower Woertuhao (M3:1), and Mengjialiang.

Sakas and Scythians

Bronze statuette of a man, Ordos, 3-1st century BCE. British Museum.
Belt buckle, Ordos, 3rd-1st century BCE.

Later, horse nomads occupied the area from the 6th century BCE to the 2nd century BCE before being driven away by the Xiongnu. According to Lebedynsky, they are thought to be the easternmost people of Scythian affinity to have settled here, just to the east of the better-known Yuezhi, althought he provide no facts for it. They are mainly known from their skeletal remains and artifacts.

They were in contact and often at war with the pre-Han and Han populations of the period. Their former territory is now located just north of the Great Wall of China, and on the south bank of the northernmost hook of the Yellow river.

According to Lebedynsky, the people represented in archaeological finds tend to display Europoïd features, and are thought to be of Scythian affinity. The Europoid faces exhibited on the artifacts might be captives and slaves captured by eastern nomads, or trading men from West Asia. They may have been related to Jie, a group of people described as Europoid in appearance and who lived in Ordos before being overrun by the Xiongnu in the 3rd century CE. The Jie numbered 200,000 in population were completely exterminated by the Chinese in 350s, its been suggested that many of them were castrated. According to Lebedynsky, the weapons, found in tombs throughout the steppes of the Ordos, are very close to those of the Scythians, especially the Sakas.

The Ordos people manufactured belt plaques, horse gear and weapons depicting animals, often in combat. The "animal-style" is similar to nomadic traditions found in Central Asia, such as that of the Scythians.

Relationships

The eastern neighbours of Ordos may have been identical with the Yuezhi who, after being vanquished by the Xiongnu, migrated to southern Asia to form the Kushan empire. They were also culturally related to another nomadic tribe to the east, the Eastern Hu (Chinese:東胡, "Donghu"), who shared a similar "art of the steppes" but appear to have been Mongoloids.. They may also have been related to the Di people (Chinese:氐 "Western Barbarians") of Chinese annals.

By one account, the area of Ordos was the legendary land of origin of the Turks.

Xiongnu occupation

In Chinese accounts, the Xiongnu first appear at Ordos in the Yizhoushu and Shanhaijing during the Warring States Period before it was occupied by Qin and Zhao. It is generally thought to be their homeland, however when exactly they came to presence is unclear. Although it might had much earlier than traditional thought as suggests from the archaeological finds.

Just as the Xiongnu expanded southward into Yuezhi territory around 160 BCE under their leader Modun. The Yuezhi in turn defeated the Sakas and pushed them away at the Issyk Kul. It is thought the Xiongnu also occupied the Ordos area during the same period, when they came in direct contact with the Chinese. From there, the Xiongnu conducted numerous devastating raids into Chinese territory (167, 158, 142, 129 BCE).

The Han dynasty started to fight the Xiongnu in the 2nd century BCE under emperor Han Wudi, and colonized the area of the Ordos under Shuofang commandery in 127 BCE. Prior to the campaign, there were already commanderies established earlier by Qin and Zhao until they were overrun by the Xiongnu in 209 BCE.

Artifacts

Main artifacts of the Ordos people, as displayed in the British Museum (Asian Gallery):

  • Bronze pole top, Ordos, 6th-5thCentury BCE. Bronze pole top, Ordos, 6th-5thCentury BCE.
  • Silver horse, Ordos, 4th-1st century BCE. Silver horse, Ordos, 4th-1st century BCE.
  • Belt buckle, Ordos, 3rd-1st century BCE. Belt buckle, Ordos, 3rd-1st century BCE.
  • Belt buckle, Ordos, 3rd-1st century BCE. Belt buckle, Ordos, 3rd-1st century BCE.
  • Ordos bronze horses, 5th-3rd century BCE. Ordos bronze horses, 5th-3rd century BCE.
  • Horse attacked by tiger, Ordos, 4th-1st century BCE. Horse attacked by tiger, Ordos, 4th-1st century BCE.

Notes

  1. Ma 2005, p. 196-197
  2. Lebedynsky, p131
  3. Jacquetta Hawkes and Sir Leonard Woolley, History of Mankind: Volume I. (New York: Harper and Row, 1963), p.172.
  4. Weiwen, Huang, Salawusu Relic. Encyclopedia of China, 1st ed.
  5. Mitochondrial DNA analysis of remains from Zhukaigou archaeological site in Inner Mongolia. WANG Hal-jing, CHANG E, CAI Da-wei, ZHANG Quan-chao, ZHOU Hui, ZHU Hong (1. Ancient DNA Laboratory, Research Center for Chinese Frontier Archaeology, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China: 2. Teaching and Research Center of Chemistry, College of Chemistry, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; 3. Macromolecular Laboratory, College of Life Science, Jilin University, Changchun 130023, China). 2007.
  6. Ma 2005, p. 298-299
  7. Ma 2005, p. 231
  8. Wuen, Taohongbala Tombs. Encyclopedia of China, 1st ed.
  9. Ma 2005, p. 230-231
  10. Ma 2005, p. 232-233, 278-279
  11. Ma 2005, p. 282-290
  12. Ma 2005, p. 188-189
  13. "The Mongoloid types of the Transbaikal area and Central and Eastern Mongolia are strongly contrasted with the Europoid type displayed at the same time by the Scythian nomads occupying Western Mongolia and their predecessors of the Bronze age". "Les Saces", Lebedinsky, p125
  14. "Europoid faces in some depictions of the Ordos, which should be attributed to a Scythian affinity", Iaroslav Lebedynsky, p125
  15. Ma 2005, p. 185-187
  16. Iaroslav Lebedynsky, p127
  17. Lebedynsky, p.124
  18. Ma 2005, p. 220-225
  19. Lebedymsky p131
  20. Ma 2005, p. 224

References

Categories: