Talk:Harness: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 19:33, 5 July 2007 editEep² (talk \| contribs)7,014 edits article vs. dab← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:56, 5 July 2007 edit undoEyrian (talk \| contribs)10,448 edits →article vs. dab: replyNext edit →
Line 10:		Line 10:

	This ''article'' is about the harness and how it has evolved from its horse-only days to present use. It ''looks'' like a ] now but ] can and do tend to look like dabs until they're fleshed out. ] are too restrictive to keep all the entries on this article. ∞] <sup>(]\|])</sup> 19:33, 5 July 2007 (UTC)		This ''article'' is about the harness and how it has evolved from its horse-only days to present use. It ''looks'' like a ] now but ] can and do tend to look like dabs until they're fleshed out. ] are too restrictive to keep all the entries on this article. ∞] <sup>(]\|])</sup> 19:33, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
			:I disagree. This article gives brief context to the definition, and then a list of objects that have names derived from it. What sort of "fleshing out" would occur? Etymology? That's not proper subject matter for an encyclopedia, but rather a dictionary. --] 22:56, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:56, 5 July 2007

Confusing interwikis

fr:Armure about harness-harnisch
pl:Pancerz about panzer
de:Panzer (Begriffsklärung) about panzer-harnisch
de:Harnisch about harness
ru:Панцирь about panzer-harnisch
ru:Гарнитур about harness

article vs. dab

This article is about the harness and how it has evolved from its horse-only days to present use. It looks like a dab page now but stubs can and do tend to look like dabs until they're fleshed out. Dab manual of style guidelines are too restrictive to keep all the entries on this article. ∞Σɛ_Þ² 19:33, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

I disagree. This article gives brief context to the definition, and then a list of objects that have names derived from it. What sort of "fleshing out" would occur? Etymology? That's not proper subject matter for an encyclopedia, but rather a dictionary. --Eyrian 22:56, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:33, 5 July 2007 editEep² (talk \| contribs)7,014 edits article vs. dab← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:56, 5 July 2007 edit undoEyrian (talk \| contribs)10,448 edits →article vs. dab: replyNext edit →
Line 10:		Line 10:

	This ''article'' is about the harness and how it has evolved from its horse-only days to present use. It ''looks'' like a ] now but ] can and do tend to look like dabs until they're fleshed out. ] are too restrictive to keep all the entries on this article. ∞] <sup>(]\|])</sup> 19:33, 5 July 2007 (UTC)		This ''article'' is about the harness and how it has evolved from its horse-only days to present use. It ''looks'' like a ] now but ] can and do tend to look like dabs until they're fleshed out. ] are too restrictive to keep all the entries on this article. ∞] <sup>(]\|])</sup> 19:33, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
			:I disagree. This article gives brief context to the definition, and then a list of objects that have names derived from it. What sort of "fleshing out" would occur? Etymology? That's not proper subject matter for an encyclopedia, but rather a dictionary. --] 22:56, 5 July 2007 (UTC)