| Revision as of 18:24, 8 July 2007 editEep² (talk | contribs)7,014 edits links | Revision as of 01:42, 9 July 2007 edit undoTaemyr (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,632 edits →links: reply about energy sources.Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==links== | ==links== | ||
| Look at ] and you'll see it deals with ''alternative'' energy, not ''renewable'' energy. ] is more relevant than ]. Also, again, the relevant info about Jain ''symbols'' is on ], ''not'' ] (which people can learn more about from a link on "Jain Symbols". Quit being difficult. ∞] <sup>(]|])</sup> 18:24, 8 July 2007 (UTC) | Look at ] and you'll see it deals with ''alternative'' energy, not ''renewable'' energy. ] is more relevant than ]. Also, again, the relevant info about Jain ''symbols'' is on ], ''not'' ] (which people can learn more about from a link on "Jain Symbols". Quit being difficult. ∞] <sup>(]|])</sup> 18:24, 8 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :Sort of. When words like ''infinite energy'' is thrown about in reference to energy sources it's in a far more sci-fi context than ] (which Alternative energy redirects too). ] 01:42, 9 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:42, 9 July 2007
links
Look at Infinite Energy (magazine) and you'll see it deals with alternative energy, not renewable energy. Alternative energy is more relevant than renewable energy. Also, again, the relevant info about Jain symbols is on Jain Symbols, not Jainism (which people can learn more about from a link on "Jain Symbols". Quit being difficult. ∞ΣɛÞ² 18:24, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Sort of. When words like infinite energy is thrown about in reference to energy sources it's in a far more sci-fi context than Energy development (which Alternative energy redirects too). Taemyr 01:42, 9 July 2007 (UTC)