Misplaced Pages

:Requests for checkuser/Case/DAde: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser | Case Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:34, 11 July 2007 editPascal.Tesson (talk | contribs)25,698 edits add another IP + explanations← Previous edit Revision as of 21:13, 11 July 2007 edit undoFayssalF (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users43,085 edits +Next edit →
Line 13: Line 13:
] has been indef blocked back in 29 November 2006 for disruption and tendentious editing by ]. ] account was created a month later. There are huge similarties between the edits of both accounts. They both edited ], ] and a few other related articles. Daniel3 has just created a new POVish portal called ]. There is a discussion going on about deleting this portal at ]. Please note that DAde is based in Germany. ] - <small>]</small> 13:37, 11 July 2007 (UTC) ] has been indef blocked back in 29 November 2006 for disruption and tendentious editing by ]. ] account was created a month later. There are huge similarties between the edits of both accounts. They both edited ], ] and a few other related articles. Daniel3 has just created a new POVish portal called ]. There is a discussion going on about deleting this portal at ]. Please note that DAde is based in Germany. ] - <small>]</small> 13:37, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
:I suppose a lot of this has grown stale. Still, as part of the pattern I believe from {{IPuser|84.146.214.116}} clearly shows the same pattern of POV pushing and the same "anti-mormon bias" paranoia. Note that Daniel 3 has also accused me and the rest of Misplaced Pages of being anti-mormon (the dispute is about non-free images...). In any case, I'm too involved in disputes with Daniel3 to impose any block myself but I believe this is such an obvious case that the checkuser might be unnecessary (although it might help in blocking a suitable IP range if deemed necessary). ] 20:34, 11 July 2007 (UTC) :I suppose a lot of this has grown stale. Still, as part of the pattern I believe from {{IPuser|84.146.214.116}} clearly shows the same pattern of POV pushing and the same "anti-mormon bias" paranoia. Note that Daniel 3 has also accused me and the rest of Misplaced Pages of being anti-mormon (the dispute is about non-free images...). In any case, I'm too involved in disputes with Daniel3 to impose any block myself but I believe this is such an obvious case that the checkuser might be unnecessary (although it might help in blocking a suitable IP range if deemed necessary). ] 20:34, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
::Why the rush? Pascal, there are more than one guy behind this circus (at least 2). -- ] - <small>]</small> 21:13, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:13, 11 July 2007

DAde

Template:Checkuser requests to be listed

request links: mainedit • links • history • watch
Filed: 13:37, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

User:DAde has been indef blocked back in 29 November 2006 for disruption and tendentious editing by JzG. User:Daniel3 account was created a month later. There are huge similarties between the edits of both accounts. They both edited Portal:Latter-day Saints, Pope Benedict XVI and a few other related articles. Daniel3 has just created a new POVish portal called Portal:Military history of the Christian West. There is a discussion going on about deleting this portal at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Military history. Please note that DAde is based in Germany. FayssalF - 13:37, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

I suppose a lot of this has grown stale. Still, as part of the pattern I believe this edit from 84.146.214.116 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) clearly shows the same pattern of POV pushing and the same "anti-mormon bias" paranoia. Note that Daniel 3 has also accused me and the rest of Misplaced Pages of being anti-mormon (the dispute is about non-free images...). In any case, I'm too involved in disputes with Daniel3 to impose any block myself but I believe this is such an obvious case that the checkuser might be unnecessary (although it might help in blocking a suitable IP range if deemed necessary). Pascal.Tesson 20:34, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Why the rush? Pascal, there are more than one guy behind this circus (at least 2). -- FayssalF - 21:13, 11 July 2007 (UTC)