| Revision as of 09:15, 15 July 2007 editPerspicacite (talk | contribs)6,334 edits →link to warning templates: 3RR← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:17, 15 July 2007 edit undoPerspicacite (talk | contribs)6,334 edits →3RR: fix - I must be sleepyNext edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| ==3RR== | ==3RR== | ||
| ] has filed a 3RR report regarding your recent edits to the articles on ] and ]. If you have reverted to an earlier page four or more times then you have broken Misplaced Pages's ]. You should undo your last reversion to avoid being blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. If you wish to comment or you believe you have not violated the rule then you may post ]. ] 09:15, 15 July 2007 (UTC) | ] has filed a 3RR report regarding your recent edits to the articles on ]. If you have reverted to an earlier page four or more times then you have broken Misplaced Pages's ]. You should undo your last reversion to avoid being blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. If you wish to comment or you believe you have not violated the rule then you may post ]. ] 09:15, 15 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 09:17, 15 July 2007
- Yo, referring to SKTFM's entry. Please ask the relivance of a topic in the discussion area, before you change or delete it. So far you have deleted the String Theory (which is the reality map concept from Tales from the Afternow in season 3), Then! You deleted the SKTFM.TV link without replacing it with the one at RANTMEDIA!!! http://sktfmtv.rantmedia.ca/
I have corrected your errors and please consult with others about possible changes.
--Nalos6 05:31, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
- I think that's there's just WAY too many links for someone of Sean's standing. Some of them are already in the body of the article, so why put them at the end, too? Why is the "string theory" considered crucial? My "consultation with others" (on the talk page) has shown me that there's nearly a consensus that the article is too long and rambling in the first place. Bennie Noakes
Ingraham
Thanks, I didn't catch that part about the "but monkey" and it being used as a term for male homosexuals. Having listened to the show a few times, I know it has nothing to do with that. The mere suggestion that she would say such a thing is unacceptable. I will petition that it be removed. Haizum 19:06, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- I don't know if it should be removed. But it should be cited, as the origin of "butt monkey" is definitely not common knowledge. Bennie Noakes 20:49, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
What the Bleep Do We Know!?
Hello, I'm writing you to determine if there is concensus amoung recent editors of What the Bleep Do We Know!? to remove it's NPOV tag. Please weigh in with your opinion on the talk page Talk:What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know!?. Thanks!! Adelord 19:32, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
notability
Of course that they are notable, I'd suggest you revert your last action or expand your explanation with a few more sentences. Lovelight 04:43, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- What do you base this notability on? Bennie Noakes 04:55, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- Are you serious? Lovelight 05:38, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- Of course. Read Talk:World_Trade_Center. This has been discussed before. This article is about the building, not the attacks, so conspiracy theory links are irrelevant. If you go to the Sept. 11 attacks page, the CT article is mentioned. Bennie Noakes 17:48, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- I see your point, however, there is interlink to the collapse of the world center theory, which shouldn't be there if consensus decided against conspiracy theories… never mind, these double standards are everywhere. Lovelight 21:29, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- Of course. Read Talk:World_Trade_Center. This has been discussed before. This article is about the building, not the attacks, so conspiracy theory links are irrelevant. If you go to the Sept. 11 attacks page, the CT article is mentioned. Bennie Noakes 17:48, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- Are you serious? Lovelight 05:38, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
link to warning templates
This page might help you get started. Non-admins cannot block, but admins are much more able to block if the rest of us place proper warnings on the offender's talk page. There is also AIV, but, again, AIV needs to see the warnings in place first. Hope that helps ... --Keesiewonder 03:03, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
3RR
Dreadstar has filed a 3RR report regarding your recent edits to the articles on What the bleep do we know!?. If you have reverted to an earlier page four or more times then you have broken Misplaced Pages's three-revert rule. You should undo your last reversion to avoid being blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. If you wish to comment or you believe you have not violated the rule then you may post here. Perspicacite 09:15, 15 July 2007 (UTC)