| Revision as of 09:58, 21 July 2007 editCerejota (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers15,178 edits →[]: speedy close, too recent, non-admin← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:56, 21 July 2007 edit undoEdokter (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users55,830 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| :{{lt|Scroll box}} | :{{lt|Scroll box}} | ||
| Worse than useless. Already banned from main article space because it causes usability issues. ] 04:25, 21 July 2007 (UTC) | Worse than useless. Already banned from main article space because it causes usability issues. ] 04:25, 21 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Keep''' The template already states it should not be used in mainspace. Serves it's purpose mainly in (ironicly) template and user space to organize lists and data. --] <small>(])</small> 11:56, 21 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:56, 21 July 2007
| < July 20 | July 22 > |
|---|
July 21
Template:Allegations of apartheid
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy Close, too recently nominated for deletion, please try WP:DRV. Cerejota 09:58, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
This non-standard template hinders the development of each article that is linked to it, by falsely claiming a link between only remotely related articles, when an article is debated others are automatically brought into the discussion, it would be better for the encyclopedia if it were deleted to allow each article to be renamed per consensus if required.. Bleh999 05:36, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
- Having been brought up in South Africa it is not difficult to spot Apartheid in the making all over the place. Discrimination generally occurs everywhere in subtle ways. Separateness was made nasty in South Africa because of the Apartheid Legislation. Can we make allegations of Apartheid about places where no Apartheid like legislation exists? Is social stratification Apartheid in the making? What about a list of countries with Apartheid like legislation?Gregorydavid 06:05, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
Supersonic keep, and close Subjected to AfD on July 10, with discussion closing on July 18, less than four days ago. WP:DRV might be in order if you have concerns, since no consensus was reached, but this is a misuse of AfD.--Cerejota 06:55, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Scroll box
Worse than useless. Already banned from main article space because it causes usability issues. The Storm Surfer 04:25, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep The template already states it should not be used in mainspace. Serves it's purpose mainly in (ironicly) template and user space to organize lists and data. --Edokter (Talk) 11:56, 21 July 2007 (UTC)