Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Alexis Y Fido: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:33, 29 July 2007 editAgüeybaná (talk | contribs)Rollbackers9,714 edits reply← Previous edit Revision as of 16:16, 29 July 2007 edit undoSwerdnaneb (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,805 edits []: keepNext edit →
Line 24: Line 24:
*'''Keep''', notable. Darn lazy deletionists. ] 07:50, 29 July 2007 (UTC) *'''Keep''', notable. Darn lazy deletionists. ] 07:50, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
**] ], ]. I've said again and again, it '''has no sources'''. --''']'']'']''' 15:33, 29 July 2007 (UTC) **] ], ]. I've said again and again, it '''has no sources'''. --''']'']'']''' 15:33, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' How about the Billboard Magazine article? It seems like their album's ranking so well on three Billboard's charts would satisfy criteria 2 of ]. The pic in the article will probably have to be deleted over copyright issues (it looks like it's from the Billboard article), but that's a cleanup issue. I can see why this looks deletable. I can also see why it could be keepable. I'm kind of ambivalent. But I do think that the article satisfies the requirements. -- ] 16:16, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:16, 29 July 2007

Alexis Y Fido

– (View log)

Alexis Y Fido (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
The Pitbulls (Alexis y Fido album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Los Reyes Del Perreo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Sobrenatural (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Wild Dogz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Non-notable reggaeton duo. Only "reference" is their Myspace page and the image on the article will likely be deleted soon. Only information on the article is their singles and albums. A Google search only shows their song's lyrics. I say delete. -- Boricuaeddie 16:15, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

  • SHOULD NOT BE DELETED: The article shouldnt be deleted becasue i expanded it more with more information on their biography and I have a couple of sources, making the site reliable and true.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nosaints4life (talkcontribs).
  • Keep: This is one of the few reggaeton articles that makes sense and is in good format. It also has some information about the duo, unlike other articles.Truko9308 16:50, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, notable. Darn lazy deletionists. Kappa 07:50, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep How about the Billboard Magazine article? It seems like their album's ranking so well on three Billboard's charts would satisfy criteria 2 of WP:BAND. The pic in the article will probably have to be deleted over copyright issues (it looks like it's from the Billboard article), but that's a cleanup issue. I can see why this looks deletable. I can also see why it could be keepable. I'm kind of ambivalent. But I do think that the article satisfies the requirements. -- Ben 16:16, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Categories: