| Revision as of 05:04, 30 July 2007 edit69.154.18.251 (talk) →Arson: removed discussion of defamatory citation, in keeping with WP:BLP which states that any reference is to be removed from talk pages as well as the article.← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:13, 30 July 2007 edit undoJade Knight (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,954 edits Undid revision 147993745 by 69.154.18.251 (talk)Next edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| ] talks a lot about this group, and mentions the Article of Faith and Practice. How are these two groups related. It is not clear from either article. ] 00:22, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | ] talks a lot about this group, and mentions the Article of Faith and Practice. How are these two groups related. It is not clear from either article. ] 00:22, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Arson == | |||
| I do not understand why an anonymous user keeps removing the citation which references the arson in question. BLP only applies to ''unsourced or poorly sourced material'', not to citations which a user might find objectionable, which are provided to ensure that Misplaced Pages articles are ]. What evidence may be given that this local newspaper (as opposed to the hundreds of others which are used on Misplaced Pages articles) is so unreliable as to be worse than no citation at all? ] 02:33, 30 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:13, 30 July 2007
Does any one know if the Church of Christ believes in Book of Abraham?
I believe they do to some degree, howver, you may want to ask User:John Hamer a Non-LDS historian who is familiar with many of the various sects. Drop him a line on his talk page. He'd know better than most. -Visorstuff 7 July 2005 00:50 (UTC)
The church believes the Bible and the Book of Mormon and only a few modern revelations. The church publishes a concise form of their beliefs in an "Articles of Faith and Practice," and they hold to it closely. They publish the Book of Commandments, but are quick to point out that this is not scripture, but simply a collection of revelations, each of which must be read carefully to determine its origin. You may find a member here and there who reads and accepts such works, but not as a whole.
Copyright problem?
The recent edit claims to be from a publication from said church. This looks like a copyright problem. Val42 July 7, 2005 01:44 (UTC)
- So you should have done something about it. Reverted to previous. -- Cyrius|✎ 08:06, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
Is this a faction of the Church of Christ with the Elijah Message
Church of Christ with the Elijah Message talks a lot about this group, and mentions the Article of Faith and Practice. How are these two groups related. It is not clear from either article. Bytebear 00:22, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Arson
I do not understand why an anonymous user keeps removing the citation which references the arson in question. BLP only applies to unsourced or poorly sourced material, not to citations which a user might find objectionable, which are provided to ensure that Misplaced Pages articles are verifiable. What evidence may be given that this local newspaper (as opposed to the hundreds of others which are used on Misplaced Pages articles) is so unreliable as to be worse than no citation at all? The Jade Knight 02:33, 30 July 2007 (UTC)