Misplaced Pages

Social apartheid: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:56, 30 July 2007 editBeit Or (talk | contribs)6,093 edits nothing has been removed, but merged back into the main article in a NPOV manner← Previous edit Revision as of 20:16, 30 July 2007 edit undoG-Dett (talk | contribs)6,192 edits rv unexplained move (how on earth can this be a POV-fork?!) – at any rate , "social apartheid" is a much more sourced, sourceable, and conceptually robust concept than "allegations of apartheid"Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
#redirect ] {{Allegations of apartheid}}
'''Social apartheid''' refers to de facto segregation on the basis of class or economic status in which an ] develops which is separated from the rest of the population.<ref></ref>
==Latin America==
The term has become common in ] in particular in societies where the polarization between rich and poor has become pronounced and has been identified in public policy as a problem that needs to be overcome, such as in ] where the supporters of ] identify social apartheid as a reality which the wealthy try to maintain<ref></ref> and ], where the term was coined to describe a situation where wealthy neighbourhoods are protected from the general population by walls, electric barbed wire and private security guards<ref></ref> and where inhabitants of the poor slums are subjected to violence.<ref></ref>

==Europe==
The term social apartheid has also been used to explain and describe the ghettoization of Muslim immigrants to Europe in impoverished suburbs<ref></ref> and as a cause of rioting and other violence.

==South Africa==
In ], the term "social apartheid" has been used to describe persistent post-] forms of exclusion and de facto segregation which exist based on class but which have a racial component due to the fact that the poor are almost entirely African.<ref></ref><ref></ref> "Social apartheid" has been cited as a factor in the composition of ]/] in South Africa.<ref></ref>
==References==
{{Reflist}}
==See Also==
* ]
* ]

]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Revision as of 20:16, 30 July 2007

Template:Allegations of apartheid Social apartheid refers to de facto segregation on the basis of class or economic status in which an underclass develops which is separated from the rest of the population.

Latin America

The term has become common in Latin America in particular in societies where the polarization between rich and poor has become pronounced and has been identified in public policy as a problem that needs to be overcome, such as in Venezuela where the supporters of Hugo Chavez identify social apartheid as a reality which the wealthy try to maintain and Brazil, where the term was coined to describe a situation where wealthy neighbourhoods are protected from the general population by walls, electric barbed wire and private security guards and where inhabitants of the poor slums are subjected to violence.

Europe

The term social apartheid has also been used to explain and describe the ghettoization of Muslim immigrants to Europe in impoverished suburbs and as a cause of rioting and other violence.

South Africa

In South Africa, the term "social apartheid" has been used to describe persistent post-apartheid forms of exclusion and de facto segregation which exist based on class but which have a racial component due to the fact that the poor are almost entirely African. "Social apartheid" has been cited as a factor in the composition of HIV/AIDS in South Africa.

References

  1. Charles Murray. The advantages of social apartheid. US experience shows Britain what to do with its underclass – get it off the streets. The Sunday Times. April 3, 2005.
  2. Paul-Emile Dupret. Help Venezuela Break Down Social Apartheid. Le Soir. Tuesday, Sep 14, 2004.
  3. Michael Lowy. The Long March of Brazil's Labor Party. Brazil: A Country Marked by Social Apartheid. Logos, vol.2 no.2, Spring 2003
  4. Emilia R. Pfannl. The Other War Zone: Poverty and Violence in the Slums of Brazil. Damocles (Harvard Graduate School of Education), April 5, 2004 Edition.
  5. Michel Collon. Racism and Social Apartheid. French Suburbs: 10 Questions. Global Research, November 22, 2005.
  6. Kate Stanley. Call of the conscience; As circumstances focus Western eyes on Africa, American visitors find the place less a mystery than they expected. Star Tribune (Minneapolis, MN), October 1, 2000.
  7. Andrew Kopkind. A reporter's notebook; facing South Africa. The Nation: November 22, 1986.
  8. Rochelle R. Davidson. HIV/AIDS in South Africa: A Rhetorical and Social Apartheid. Villanova University (2004).

See Also

Categories: