Misplaced Pages

Strict scrutiny: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:48, 5 December 2004 editRedWordSmith (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,523 edits Law stub notice← Previous edit Revision as of 05:25, 8 June 2005 edit undoOregonrains (talk | contribs)150 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Strict scrutiny''' is a standard used by the ] in deciding whether a law or policy is to be adjudged ] or not. To pass strict scrutiny, the law or policy must be justified by a "compelling governmental interest" as well as being the least restrictive means for achieving that interest. '''Strict scrutiny''' is a standard used by the ] in deciding whether a law or policy is to be adjudged ] or not. To pass strict scrutiny, the law or policy must be justified by a "compelling governmental interest" as well as being the least restrictive means for achieving that interest. Strict scrutiny is the highest standard used by the Court to review the consitutionality of a law.


{{law-stub}} {{law-stub}}

Revision as of 05:25, 8 June 2005

Strict scrutiny is a standard used by the US Supreme Court in deciding whether a law or policy is to be adjudged constitutional or not. To pass strict scrutiny, the law or policy must be justified by a "compelling governmental interest" as well as being the least restrictive means for achieving that interest. Strict scrutiny is the highest standard used by the Court to review the consitutionality of a law.

Stub icon

This law-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Category: