| Revision as of 15:42, 6 August 2007 editWang C-H (talk | contribs)73 edits withdrawn← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:46, 6 August 2007 edit undoChesdovi (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users22,098 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| *'''Keep''' clearly notable. It would be better titled Chinese Settlement of Tibet or Chinese Immigration to Tibet however. ] 04:54, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' clearly notable. It would be better titled Chinese Settlement of Tibet or Chinese Immigration to Tibet however. ] 04:54, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' for notability. ] 15:37, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' for notability. ] 15:37, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' but needs cleaning up to bring it up to standard. It is a bit difficult to garner information from NPOV sources - there have not, I don't think, been any resolutions against this settlement policy made by the UN or other similar international bodies. This fact however does not make it non-notable. ] 15:46, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Withdraw nomination. Admins, please close. --] 15:42, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | Withdraw nomination. Admins, please close. --] 15:42, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:46, 6 August 2007
Chinese settlements in Tibet
- Chinese settlements in Tibet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Not notable. Wang C-H 19:15, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - The article makes a claim of notability - that the settlements have contributed to the modernization of Tibet. There are sources backing this up. Even if there is controversy on this point, it warrants an article.--Danaman5 20:06, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletions. -- Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 20:12, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, although the title may be too limiting (do all Chinese move into just these settlements? I don't think so). The Chinese government has been "settling" ethnic Chinese into Tibet for the entire time they've controlled it. Is there no other article on this? --Dhartung | Talk 20:15, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and cleanup. Notable topic, though it needs better sourcing than a bunch of Free Tibet websites and a single heavily partisan journal article. cab 00:52, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep clearly notable. It would be better titled Chinese Settlement of Tibet or Chinese Immigration to Tibet however. Bigdaddy1981 04:54, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep for notability. RandomCritic 15:37, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep but needs cleaning up to bring it up to standard. It is a bit difficult to garner information from NPOV sources - there have not, I don't think, been any resolutions against this settlement policy made by the UN or other similar international bodies. This fact however does not make it non-notable. Chesdovi 15:46, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Withdraw nomination. Admins, please close. --Wang C-H 15:42, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Categories: