Misplaced Pages

User talk:Nohat: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:21, 12 June 2005 editHalibutt (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers34,067 edits →Black Book← Previous edit Revision as of 23:25, 12 June 2005 edit undoNohat (talk | contribs)Administrators11,044 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:


::Also, I decided to start that archive to avoid listing all of the users involved on RfC or any other page. I simply wanted to keep the things civil and canalized, without having to resort to all the painful dispute resolution process, accusations and so on. Your reaction was certainly not what I expected. ]] 23:21, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC) ::Also, I decided to start that archive to avoid listing all of the users involved on RfC or any other page. I simply wanted to keep the things civil and canalized, without having to resort to all the painful dispute resolution process, accusations and so on. Your reaction was certainly not what I expected. ]] 23:21, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)

:A "Black Book" which exists solely to vilify users who you disagree with consistutes personal attacks. The page was deleted per ]. If you have a problem with a user's behavior, the proper course of action is to list that user on ]. Compiling a list of users who have said things you disagree with, particularly if that list is not kept in user space, and demanding they apologize and rescind their comments in some kind of kangaroo court is totally unacceptable. The dispute resolution process exists for a reason, and creating an end-run around it is neither appropriate nor warranted. ] 23:25, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:25, 12 June 2005

Archives

Black Book

Nohat, why did you delete that page? Was it listed on vfd? It was a project page and I'm sure it should be there. Whether your remarks on Talk:Kiev are biased or not is another issue, but I believe that you should've at least consulted the author of that project before you deleted it. Please be so kind as to explain why was the page deleted. Halibutt 23:18, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)

Also, I decided to start that archive to avoid listing all of the users involved on RfC or any other page. I simply wanted to keep the things civil and canalized, without having to resort to all the painful dispute resolution process, accusations and so on. Your reaction was certainly not what I expected. Halibutt 23:21, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)
A "Black Book" which exists solely to vilify users who you disagree with consistutes personal attacks. The page was deleted per Misplaced Pages:Remove personal attacks. If you have a problem with a user's behavior, the proper course of action is to list that user on Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment. Compiling a list of users who have said things you disagree with, particularly if that list is not kept in user space, and demanding they apologize and rescind their comments in some kind of kangaroo court is totally unacceptable. The dispute resolution process exists for a reason, and creating an end-run around it is neither appropriate nor warranted. Nohat 23:25, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)