Revision as of 04:27, 17 August 2007 editNug (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers22,427 edits →Soviet historigraphy← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:32, 17 August 2007 edit undoNug (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers22,427 editsm →Soviet historigraphyNext edit → | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Soviet historigraphy == | == Soviet historigraphy == | ||
Some Erna veterans were charged and convicted of spying for Finland. If Soviet historigraphy views them as Nazi collaborators and controlled by the Abwehr, why were they not charged as being German spies? Is this an example of historical revisionism to suit current politics? I'd like a source for this assertion of Nazi |
Some Erna veterans were charged and convicted of spying for Finland. If Soviet historigraphy views them as Nazi collaborators and controlled by the Abwehr, why were they not charged as being German spies? Is this an example of historical revisionism to suit current politics? I'd like a source for this assertion of Nazi collaborationism from the period. ] 04:24, 17 August 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:32, 17 August 2007
Estonia Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||||||
|
Soviet historigraphy
Some Erna veterans were charged and convicted of spying for Finland. If Soviet historigraphy views them as Nazi collaborators and controlled by the Abwehr, why were they not charged as being German spies? Is this an example of historical revisionism to suit current politics? I'd like a source for this assertion of Nazi collaborationism from the period. Martintg 04:24, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Categories: