User talk:Biggspowd: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 02:37, 21 August 2007 view sourceBiggspowd (talk \| contribs)861 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:43, 21 August 2007 view source Philippe (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users18,242 edits Nope.Next edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::I will, however, reduce the length of the block. It was excessively long (I didn't see that your 1 month block was a mistake, so this was unprogressive). - ] \| ] 02:34, 21 August 2007 (UTC)		::I will, however, reduce the length of the block. It was excessively long (I didn't see that your 1 month block was a mistake, so this was unprogressive). - ] \| ] 02:34, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
	:::That's better, but I want it totally removed, I have various AFDs in progress, and 800 good edits are a lot better than 2 bad edits, I am a good editor. I made a slight mistake. ] 02:37, 21 August 2007 (UTC)		:::That's better, but I want it totally removed, I have various AFDs in progress, and 800 good edits are a lot better than 2 bad edits, I am a good editor. I made a slight mistake. ] 02:37, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
			::::You made a series of mistakes. Sorry, I'm as willing as the next guy to offer a second chance... but not a fifth. Three bad edits are a coincidence. Four are a pattern. Five are a habit. Kurykh has declined your unblock and I endorse that. - ] \| ] 02:43, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:43, 21 August 2007

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Biggspowd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a persistent vandal, I made a slight error as I accidentally put something I intended to put on a message board. This block is very harsh, and I am a good editor, I would appreciate if it could be removed. Thank you in advance.

Decline reason:

Putting this anywhere will get you blocked. And your removal of "anti-smoking slants" aren't stellar either. — Kurykh 02:35, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You put "BOW DOWN TO THE KING, HE IS BACK!@!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" in an article about Triple H. You have a history of vandalism, including a string of blocks as long as my arm. I'll let another admin review it, but I personally wouldn't be inclined to lift it. - Philippe | Talk 02:31, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

I will, however, reduce the length of the block. It was excessively long (I didn't see that your 1 month block was a mistake, so this was unprogressive). - Philippe | Talk 02:34, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

That's better, but I want it totally removed, I have various AFDs in progress, and 800 good edits are a lot better than 2 bad edits, I am a good editor. I made a slight mistake. Biggspowd 02:37, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

You made a series of mistakes. Sorry, I'm as willing as the next guy to offer a second chance... but not a fifth. Three bad edits are a coincidence. Four are a pattern. Five are a habit. Kurykh has declined your unblock and I endorse that. - Philippe | Talk 02:43, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

August 2007

You have been blocked for a period of 3 months from editing in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. - Philippe | Talk 02:18, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:37, 21 August 2007 view sourceBiggspowd (talk \| contribs)861 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:43, 21 August 2007 view source Philippe (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users18,242 edits Nope.Next edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::I will, however, reduce the length of the block. It was excessively long (I didn't see that your 1 month block was a mistake, so this was unprogressive). - ] \| ] 02:34, 21 August 2007 (UTC)		::I will, however, reduce the length of the block. It was excessively long (I didn't see that your 1 month block was a mistake, so this was unprogressive). - ] \| ] 02:34, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
	:::That's better, but I want it totally removed, I have various AFDs in progress, and 800 good edits are a lot better than 2 bad edits, I am a good editor. I made a slight mistake. ] 02:37, 21 August 2007 (UTC)		:::That's better, but I want it totally removed, I have various AFDs in progress, and 800 good edits are a lot better than 2 bad edits, I am a good editor. I made a slight mistake. ] 02:37, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
			::::You made a series of mistakes. Sorry, I'm as willing as the next guy to offer a second chance... but not a fifth. Three bad edits are a coincidence. Four are a pattern. Five are a habit. Kurykh has declined your unblock and I endorse that. - ] \| ] 02:43, 21 August 2007 (UTC)