Misplaced Pages

User talk:Biggspowd: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:26, 21 August 2007 view sourceBaseball Bugs (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers126,813 edits AfDs started by this user← Previous edit Revision as of 02:01, 24 August 2007 view source Biggspowd (talk | contribs)861 edits again, I quit, and I do not want immature editors insulting me on this page, it is overNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT ]
{{unblock reviewed|1=I am not a persistent vandal, I made a slight error as I accidentally put something I intended to put on a message board. This block is very harsh, and I am a good editor, I would appreciate if it could be removed. Thank you in advance.|decline=Putting anywhere will get you blocked. And your removal of "anti-smoking slants" aren't stellar either. — ''']''' 02:35, 21 August 2007 (UTC)}}

:You put "BOW DOWN TO THE KING, HE IS BACK!@!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" in an article about Triple H. You have a history of vandalism, including a string of blocks as long as my arm. I'll let another admin review it, but I personally wouldn't be inclined to lift it. - ] | ] 02:31, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
::I will, however, reduce the length of the block. It was excessively long (I didn't see that your 1 month block was a mistake, so this was unprogressive). - ] | ] 02:34, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
:::That's better, but I want it totally removed, I have various AFDs in progress, and 800 good edits are a lot better than 2 bad edits, I am a good editor. I made a slight mistake. ] 02:37, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
::::You made a series of mistakes. Sorry, I'm as willing as the next guy to offer a second chance... but not a fifth. Three bad edits are a coincidence. Four are a pattern. Five are a habit. Kurykh has declined your unblock and I endorse that. - ] | ] 02:43, 21 August 2007 (UTC)


== August 2007 ==
<div style="padding:5px; border:1px solid #c0c090; background-color:#FEC;" class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' for a period of '''3 months''' from editing in accordance with ] for persistent ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. - ] &#124; ] 02:18, 21 August 2007 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-vblock -->

== Reverting your "good" edits ==
Let's see, how many temper tantrums does this make in the month of August? How many times are you going to storm off, say "fuck you all", and "retire", only to come back and resume editing? You're blocked for a week and that means you can't edit for a week, including your own talk page. The only thing you're allowed to do when you're blocked is request an unblock, which you've done. Unfortunately, the unblock request was denied. Continuing to edit your talk page is block avoidance, which behavior will get you blocked for increasingly longer periods of time. As for your "anti-smoking slant" edits, it reeks of ] and ], and most definitely is tendentious editing. I hope you will take this week to reevaluate your strategy. ] 13:34, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

== AfDs started by this user ==

So what happens to them? ] is in process right now. ] (] | ]) 17:47, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
:In theory, they should be judged primarily on their own merits, without giving ''very'' much weight to the possible agenda of the editor who flagged them. ] <sup>'']''</sup> 18:26, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:01, 24 August 2007

Redirect to: