| Revision as of 18:34, 21 August 2007 editWikipediatrix (talk | contribs)9,623 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:00, 21 August 2007 edit undoDavid Eppstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators225,853 editsm delsortNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| * weak delete, based on Brignell being certainly less notable than Lambert ] 16:58, 21 August 2007 (UTC) | * weak delete, based on Brignell being certainly less notable than Lambert ] 16:58, 21 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Delete''' per nom. There's literally nothing here. Primary sources like Brignell's self-published books and his personal web page can't sustain an article. ] 18:34, 21 August 2007 (UTC) | * '''Delete''' per nom. There's literally nothing here. Primary sources like Brignell's self-published books and his personal web page can't sustain an article. ] 18:34, 21 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>—] 20:00, 21 August 2007 (UTC)</small> | |||
Revision as of 20:00, 21 August 2007
John Brignell
- John Brignell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable; fails WP:BIO and WP:PROF. The only secondary sources ever provided are critical, and consist of links to Tim Lambert's blog and to brief coverage in the Skeptic's Dictionary. This is not "non-trivial coverage in independent, reliable secondary sources." The article is a WP:COATRACK and POV fork to present Brignell's minoritarian views out of context. MastCell 16:41, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- weak delete, based on Brignell being certainly less notable than Lambert William M. Connolley 16:58, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. There's literally nothing here. Primary sources like Brignell's self-published books and his personal web page can't sustain an article. wikipediatrix 18:34, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. —David Eppstein 20:00, 21 August 2007 (UTC)