| Revision as of 16:40, 24 August 2007 editGavin.collins (talk | contribs)18,503 edits Category: Fiction← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:04, 24 August 2007 edit undoGoochelaar (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers5,371 edits →[]: Keep/merge + commentsNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD| |
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|}} | ||
| :{{la|GURPS 4e Basic Set}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|GURPS 4e Basic Set}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| Misplaced Pages is not a book promotion site like Amazon or Ebay. Notability to come. --] 15:44, 24 August 2007 (UTC) | Misplaced Pages is not a book promotion site like Amazon or Ebay. Notability to come. --] 15:44, 24 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep'''/'''Merge''': I thank Gavin for drawing attention to the poorness of some of these articles. | |||
| :First of all: does this proposal includes ] itself? It seems not, but there is an AfD tag on its page. | |||
| :Secondly: as already partially said in the discussion about ], you seem to believe that the publisher of these books looks for free advertising. In the field of role-playing games, GURPS and its supplements are amongst the most well-known: it would be a bit like saying that ] spams Wikipidia to sell more ] copies. | |||
| :Thirdly, and more to the point: other people will be able to say more about the notability of these books, but a quick search shows that some of them received awards and recognitions (some of them before the diffusion of the Web). For instance, ] won the "Best Roleplaying Supplement of 1988" ] (see the ). | |||
| :So, my suggestion is to keep the two or three truly notable books, and merge whatever is worthy morging of the rest, in ] or in ]. --] 17:04, 24 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:04, 24 August 2007
GURPS 4e Basic Set
- GURPS 4e Basic Set (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
These artilces are advertorials that fail the WP:SPAM guidlines, designed to promote books that do not meet Misplaced Pages:Notability (fiction) criteria. The articles do not contain real-world context or sourced analysis, nor do they offering detail on a work's development, impact or historical significance, but are solely a detailed summary of each book’s content, and as such fail WP:Fiction. They have not received coverage from reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject; rather they cite links to advertorials, product launch announcements and an award given to them from a related trade association. These articles have been created to promote both the books, the games and the publishers in contravention of WP:SPAM. The books in question are:
GURPS Bestiary, GURPS Blood Types, GURPS Shapeshifters, GURPS High-Tech, GURPS Atomic Horror, GURPS Autoduel, GURPS Mysteries, GURPS Space,GURPS Supers, GURPS Ice Age, GURPS Middle Ages I, GURPS Timeline, GURPS Alternate Earths, GURPS Alternate Earths II, GURPS Black Ops, GURPS Cabal, GURPS Callahan's Crosstime Saloon, GURPS Horseclans, GURPS Illuminati University, GURPS Planet of Adventure, GURPS Reign of Steel, GURPS Riverworld, GURPS Terradyne, GURPS Uplift, GURPS War Against the Chtorr, GURPS Mixed Doubles, GURPS Traveller, GURPS Traveller: Interstellar Wars,GURPS In Nomine.
Misplaced Pages is not a book promotion site like Amazon or Ebay. Notability to come. --Gavin Collins 15:44, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep/Merge: I thank Gavin for drawing attention to the poorness of some of these articles.
- First of all: does this proposal includes GURPS itself? It seems not, but there is an AfD tag on its page.
- Secondly: as already partially said in the discussion about Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/GURPS Technomancer, you seem to believe that the publisher of these books looks for free advertising. In the field of role-playing games, GURPS and its supplements are amongst the most well-known: it would be a bit like saying that Bloomsbury Publishing spams Wikipidia to sell more Harry Potter copies.
- Thirdly, and more to the point: other people will be able to say more about the notability of these books, but a quick search shows that some of them received awards and recognitions (some of them before the diffusion of the Web). For instance, GURPS Space won the "Best Roleplaying Supplement of 1988" Origins Award (see the list of winners).
- So, my suggestion is to keep the two or three truly notable books, and merge whatever is worthy morging of the rest, in GURPS or in List of GURPS books. --Goochelaar 17:04, 24 August 2007 (UTC)