| Revision as of 19:53, 24 August 2007 view sourceCvyvvZkmSUDowVf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers25,542 edits i'm done with this discussion. don't you get it? I'm sorry you disagree with my opinion that two pages should be deleted. stop bothering me← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:03, 14 September 2007 view source WhisperToMe (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users662,797 edits →Category deletionNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| I've been trying to narrow the template cats as much as possible. In other words, using general cats for subcats or for templates that can't otherwise be categorized. Lots of cases where a template is in a subcategory AND a main category. In this case, it was in both. Geography infobox and regular old old infobox. Well the template in question was in a category (North American country subdivision infobox templates) which was already indirectly in the Geography infobox category, which is in the general infobox category. So the specific cat basically replaced the 2 general ones. Hopefully I'm not talking gibberish. :) --]<sup>]</sup> 00:15, 24 August 2007 (UTC) | I've been trying to narrow the template cats as much as possible. In other words, using general cats for subcats or for templates that can't otherwise be categorized. Lots of cases where a template is in a subcategory AND a main category. In this case, it was in both. Geography infobox and regular old old infobox. Well the template in question was in a category (North American country subdivision infobox templates) which was already indirectly in the Geography infobox category, which is in the general infobox category. So the specific cat basically replaced the 2 general ones. Hopefully I'm not talking gibberish. :) --]<sup>]</sup> 00:15, 24 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :Well. Maybe we should call it Wikipediaese. :) I'm just trying to get it as organized as possible. I guess that's the best way to sum it up. And templates in particular tended to be categorized in as many places as possible, so you'd end up with overpopulated cats. That's what I'm trying to fix. Probably makes more sense. :) --]<sup>]</sup> 02:20, 24 August 2007 (UTC) | :Well. Maybe we should call it Wikipediaese. :) I'm just trying to get it as organized as possible. I guess that's the best way to sum it up. And templates in particular tended to be categorized in as many places as possible, so you'd end up with overpopulated cats. That's what I'm trying to fix. Probably makes more sense. :) --]<sup>]</sup> 02:20, 24 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=September_11%2C_2001_attacks&curid=5058690&diff=157749198&oldid=157696514 | |||
| I'm not from PA.. I'm from TX. Maybe the other guy was from PA, but I'm not sure. | |||
| Why not use "near Shanksville" ? The crash did not happen in the Shanksville limits... ] 01:03, 14 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:03, 14 September 2007
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
 Archives |
|
no archives yet (create) |
Category deletion
I've been trying to narrow the template cats as much as possible. In other words, using general cats for subcats or for templates that can't otherwise be categorized. Lots of cases where a template is in a subcategory AND a main category. In this case, it was in both. Geography infobox and regular old old infobox. Well the template in question was in a category (North American country subdivision infobox templates) which was already indirectly in the Geography infobox category, which is in the general infobox category. So the specific cat basically replaced the 2 general ones. Hopefully I'm not talking gibberish. :) --Woohookitty 00:15, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- Well. Maybe we should call it Wikipediaese. :) I'm just trying to get it as organized as possible. I guess that's the best way to sum it up. And templates in particular tended to be categorized in as many places as possible, so you'd end up with overpopulated cats. That's what I'm trying to fix. Probably makes more sense. :) --Woohookitty 02:20, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
I'm not from PA.. I'm from TX. Maybe the other guy was from PA, but I'm not sure.
Why not use "near Shanksville" ? The crash did not happen in the Shanksville limits... WhisperToMe 01:03, 14 September 2007 (UTC)