| Revision as of 16:56, 17 June 2005 editJasonglchu (talk | contribs)2,563 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:40, 17 June 2005 edit undo62.253.96.44 (talk) + visibilityNext edit → | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
| *'' "Keep" '' ] 16:53, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) | *'' "Keep" '' ] 16:53, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) | ||
| **Note: This is the same user who proposed the policy "Administrators can't vote" ] | ] | ] 16:56, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:40, 17 June 2005
Claudia Newman
Hoax. -- Longhair | Talk 10:12, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- There is a URL from a news site linked in the article that proves that the story is completely false. The name does not even match that of the article.
- Delete -- Longhair | Talk 10:12, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Ambi 10:13, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Strong Delete -- Could the spammer please stop? RussellG 10:57, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- There is no basis for that claim.
- Unsigned comment above from 220.237.197.101 -- Longhair | Talk 10:58, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- The article you linked to yourself disproves your article.
-
- It most certainly does not
- Unsigned comment above from 220.237.197.101 -- Longhair | Talk 11:24, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: Sign your posts people. After your comment, use four of these ~~~~ -- Longhair | Talk 11:26, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I see no evidence it disproves it (JoJo)
- Unsigned comment above from 220.237.197.101 -- Longhair | Talk 11:29, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Nice tits. delete Dunc|☺ 12:15, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep -- 'JoJo 13:28, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)JoJo'
- Keep CzechPartisan
- Comment: CzechPartisan's only edits are to VfD. -- Longhair | Talk 13:57, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Quite so, no need to get snarky. Given your reasoning thus far it seems this is only a popularity contest anyway. Go whine to the T-man about it. 'JoJo 13:52, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)JoJo'
- Strong delete, as soon as possible. Also, votes by sockpuppets shouldn't be counted. Columbia 13:54, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
Hey, they called you a sock puppet! Not like your votes which we must assume as legit... 'JoJo 13:59, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)JoJo' Keep Matthewleung87 14:16, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Strong Keep Jamesss 14:26, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Sockpuppets Proto 14:35, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- DeleteLectonar 14:55, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Nonsense. --Habap 15:03, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, hoax. Alphax 15:06, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I sense... a great disturbance... in sockpuppets. Delete. jglc | t | c 15:07, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete nice cleavage — unconfirmed; no google match; likely hoax. — RJH 15:18, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete hoax, nothing in the news article supports what is said here. --Etacar11 16:37, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete if the article makes anyone notable, it's the girl, not her "mother". Septentrionalis 18:06, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete sock supported hoax. Capitalistroadster 01:45, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Strongest Keep having spoken to some friends of mine, they assure me this is worth keeping. I agree wholeheartedly- 'Hotpants 07:05, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)Hotpants'
- okay, keep, but only because of the tits. Last one, geez 'TagTeam 07:43, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)TagTeam'
- Delete - Sockpuppet-backed hoax. This is a recording. --FCYTravis 09:12, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep- very good form, and lack of a persuasive argument that it is fiction- 'Freezer 10:05, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)Freezer'
- Delete - rubbish backed up by sockpuppets, possible copyvio picture. More pseudo-postmodernist experimentation? - Skysmith 10:38, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Nope, not a copyright violation, she said she gave the photo to a friend- 'TagTeam 10:47, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)TagTeam'
- "Keep" MARMOT 16:53, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)