Revision as of 16:23, 27 August 2007 editA Nobody (talk | contribs)53,000 edits k← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:10, 27 August 2007 edit undoMandsford (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators68,430 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*'''Delete''' per ]. --] 15:19, 27 August 2007 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per ]. --] 15:19, 27 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
*'''Keep''', but improve per ] and ] in order to address Otto4711's concerns by adding references and more regular text. Sincerely, --<font face="Times New Roman">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 16:23, 27 August 2007 (UTC) | *'''Keep''', but improve per ] and ] in order to address Otto4711's concerns by adding references and more regular text. Sincerely, --<font face="Times New Roman">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 16:23, 27 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
*'''Comment''' It took me awhile to read WP:LIST and understand what it means when one refers to a list of "indiscriminate information", but this is the classic example... a list of things with little or no explanation as to why they're there, beyond what the title of the article implies. Improve, or delete ] 17:10, 27 August 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:10, 27 August 2007
Los Angeles Police Department in media
- Los Angeles Police Department in media (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Delete - laundry list catch-all article seeking to capture anything in which the LAPD appears, regardless of the importance of the LAPD to the fiction from which it's drawn. Tells us nothing about the LAPD, nothing about the fiction it's from, nothing about the real world. Otto4711 15:15, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per User:Otto4711. --Hornet35 15:19, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, but improve per User:Fresheneesz/Don't Destroy and Misplaced Pages:What Isn't Grounds for Article Deletion in order to address Otto4711's concerns by adding references and more regular text. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 16:23, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Comment It took me awhile to read WP:LIST and understand what it means when one refers to a list of "indiscriminate information", but this is the classic example... a list of things with little or no explanation as to why they're there, beyond what the title of the article implies. Improve, or delete Mandsford 17:10, 27 August 2007 (UTC)