Misplaced Pages

Category talk:Humour: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:01, 28 August 2007 editCultural Freedom (talk | contribs)1,294 edits Possible move← Previous edit Revision as of 13:47, 14 October 2008 edit undoKbdank71 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users126,447 edits CFD 2008 Oct 7Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Cfd result|Category:Humor|date=2008 October 7}}

==Possible move== ==Possible move==
To be consistent with the Misplaced Pages article ], would not a move to <nowiki>]</nowiki> be appropriate. ] ] To be consistent with the Misplaced Pages article ], would not a move to <nowiki>]</nowiki> be appropriate. ] ]

Revision as of 13:47, 14 October 2008

Categories for discussionThis category was nominated for deletion on 7 October 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

Possible move

To be consistent with the Misplaced Pages article humour, would not a move to ] be appropriate. Mintguy (T)

Perhaps better would be to switch the humour article back to humor, where the article started (it was changed, in violation of WP guidelines, some time ago). --Cultural Freedom talk 2007-08-28 21:01 21:01, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Include link to Category:Misplaced Pages humor or not?

I think we should, it's disambiguating, and it is humor. It's just a link. Go to image and there's a link to Misplaced Pages:image. Let's just put it in; it's not a paper encyclopedia, so there's no space requirement, and after all, it's just a link. --HereToHelp (talk) 02:49, 6 December 2005 (UTC)