Revision as of 22:50, 2 September 2007 editMoulton (talk | contribs)897 edits →Micro-Evolution and Macro-Evolution: Forgot to sign it.← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:54, 3 September 2007 edit undoSteve Dufour (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers21,429 edits →Micro-Evolution and Macro-EvolutionNext edit → | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
{{quotation|Tour's field of organic chemistry is unrelated to evolutionary biology.}} | {{quotation|Tour's field of organic chemistry is unrelated to evolutionary biology.}} | ||
The field of organic chemistry is related to ]. Darwin's mechanism applies to ] (descent with modification of living species). The parallel field of micro-evolution applies to processes operating at the molecular level by which organic molecules change. Darwin's mechanism assumes and depends on micro-evolution, but doesn't encompass or subsume it, model it, or explain it. ] 22:50, 2 September 2007 (UTC) | The field of organic chemistry is related to ]. Darwin's mechanism applies to ] (descent with modification of living species). The parallel field of micro-evolution applies to processes operating at the molecular level by which organic molecules change. Darwin's mechanism assumes and depends on micro-evolution, but doesn't encompass or subsume it, model it, or explain it. ] 22:50, 2 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
:Moulton, I think you are making the whole thing too complex. Tour doesn't study evolution does he? On the other hand, everything is related somehow. ] 02:54, 3 September 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:54, 3 September 2007
Biography: Science and Academia Stub‑class | |||||||||||||
|
Creationism Stub‑class | ||||||||||
|
Controversial article
Why is his article on chemical terrorism considered controversial? Is it because some people said it gives away too much information to potential terrorists? The point of controversy should be mentioned in the article. Thanks. Steve Dufour 17:04, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Most probably the title: "Better Killing Through Chemistry" either led some to believe he was advocating chemical warfare, ot that he was being insensitive. Unfortunately this statement is unsourced, so we can't find out. Hrafn42 17:38, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Micro-Evolution and Macro-Evolution
The article states:
Tour's field of organic chemistry is unrelated to evolutionary biology.
The field of organic chemistry is related to micro-evolution. Darwin's mechanism applies to macro-evolution (descent with modification of living species). The parallel field of micro-evolution applies to processes operating at the molecular level by which organic molecules change. Darwin's mechanism assumes and depends on micro-evolution, but doesn't encompass or subsume it, model it, or explain it. Moulton 22:50, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Moulton, I think you are making the whole thing too complex. Tour doesn't study evolution does he? On the other hand, everything is related somehow. Steve Dufour 02:54, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- Automatically assessed biography (science and academia) articles
- Automatically assessed biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class Creationism articles
- Unknown-importance Creationism articles
- WikiProject Creationism articles