Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 11:02, 5 September 2007

Welcome to Misplaced Pages!!!

v t e Links for Wikipedians interested in India-related content
This is a collection of links to WikiProject pages and Category pages relevant to India-related content
WP:India	Noticeboard Discussion board Article alerts Deletion talks Unreferenced BLPs India Portal Collaborations of the month India stubs Category adoptions Article requests
WikiProjects	Region India States Districts Cities Religion Hinduism Buddhism Jainism Sikhism Zoroastrianism Islam Christianity State Andhra Pradesh Arunachal Pradesh Assam Bihar Chhattisgarh Goa Gujarat Haryana Himachal Pradesh Jharkhand Karnataka Kerala Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra Manipur Meghalaya Mizoram Nagaland Odisha Punjab Rajasthan Sikkim Tamil Nadu Telangana Tripura Uttar Pradesh Uttarakhand West Bengal UTs Andaman and Nicobar Islands Chandigarh Dadra and Nagar Haveli Daman and Diu Delhi Jammu and Kashmir Lakshadweep Puducherry Cities Chennai Hyderabad Mangalore Mumbai Patna Culture Translation Classical Tamil Literature Hindustani and allied languages Music Cinema Television Other Education Geography Localisation Caste system Trade History Maps Politics Indian portals Military history Biodiversity, Protected areas & Environment Transport (Railways & Roads) Indian and Pakistani Wikipedians cooperation board
Newcomers	Indian Wikipedians (add ] to your userpage) India category Wikimedia India English mailing list Wikimedia India mailing list

— Ambuj Saxena (☎) 12:45, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

edits to Romila Thapar

pls ensure that material about living people comply with Misplaced Pages guidelines. controversial content should be sourced to reliable sources, written in a neutral manner and must not be given undue weight. Doldrums 17:06, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

In addition to reading Misplaced Pages's policy on biographies of living persons, which your edits to Romila Thapar appear to contravene, you should acquaint yourself with the

Thank You, I have gone through the policy and do accept that my initial post (it was unsigned) may have not adhered to the guidelines in the strictest sense of the word.

However, I am clear enough that my other insertions were all in line with the policy. Infact, it convinces me that the current page, which you all have so zealously protected isn't what it should have been, if guidelines were to be implemented in toto.

As far as re-insertion is concerned, it was only a logical response to mindless edits. The talk continues on the page but the responses in no way answer the queries which I have raised Ankush135 13:26, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppet tags

Stop putting sockpuppet tags on people unless you have proof. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by CambridgeBayWeather (talk • contribs) 13:52, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

For one, I don't use pseudonames unlike other righteous beings

Secondly, this was in response to tags which I had received

The tag that was put on your page was by the now blocked User:Pickled herring red and an IP. Not necessarily by the two people that you tagged. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 14:39, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

reverts

this is a good time to introduce you to the three revert rule. Doldrums 16:37, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

My, what presumptions people have of other's ignorance

Ankush135 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=''This blocking is totally without basis and in extremely bad faith. Before accusing someone of being a sock, the administrator should make the efforts to find out if there is some truth in those allegations. Else, she/he is simply not worth being an admin. Renounce your admin rights then'' |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=''This blocking is totally without basis and in extremely bad faith. Before accusing someone of being a sock, the administrator should make the efforts to find out if there is some truth in those allegations. Else, she/he is simply not worth being an admin. Renounce your admin rights then'' |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=''This blocking is totally without basis and in extremely bad faith. Before accusing someone of being a sock, the administrator should make the efforts to find out if there is some truth in those allegations. Else, she/he is simply not worth being an admin. Renounce your admin rights then'' |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Ankush135 (block log • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • user rights management • checkuser (log))

IP address: 203.112.80.139 (block log • active blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • unblock • checkuser (log))
Blocking admin: DaGizza (talk • blocks)
Block message:

WARNING: If you were blocked directly then you are using the wrong template and your block will not be reviewed since you have not provided a reason for unblocking. Please use {{unblock | reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} instead.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, or when you need checkuser assistance, please place {{subst:Unblock on hold-notification | 1=Ankush135}} on the administrator's talk page. Then replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-auto on hold | 1=DaGizza | 2=<nowiki>Sock of one of the sub-continental trolls, can't tell but is blatently seen in this sock tagging of established users in his first 50 edits</nowiki> | 3=203.112.80.139 | 4= | 5=~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting decline reason here with any specific rationale. If the decline= parameter is omitted, a reason for unblocking will be requested.

{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=203.112.80.139 | 2=<nowiki>Sock of one of the sub-continental trolls, can't tell but is blatently seen in this sock tagging of established users in his first 50 edits</nowiki> | 3=DaGizza | decline=decline reason here ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=203.112.80.139 | 2=<nowiki>Sock of one of the sub-continental trolls, can't tell but is blatently seen in this sock tagging of established users in his first 50 edits</nowiki> | 3=DaGizza | accept=accept reason here ~~~~}}

Yesterday, Akhilleus accused me of acting in bad faith and someone else advised me on Not sockpuppeting someone.

Doldrums is one person who refuses to engage in any sort of discussion for he seems to believe that he has been given the God ordained right to decide on matters beyond his comprehension

The worst part of the scum attack is blocking of my account by some DaGizza on the pretext of being some 'Sock of one of the sub-continental trolls, can't tell but is blatently seen in this sock tagging of established users in his first 50 edits'

It is utter rubbish and is simply an indicator of the rotten mentality of people like DaGizza who rush to enforce order without checking the basis of the allegations or perusing the discussion on the talk page

Honestly, you people are so sick that it makes me puke

• Requests for unblock
• Requests for unblock-auto